Laserfiche WebLink
WL~It&JR ~, DORN. <br />,,* RQ~r'RT <br /> <br />January 26, !R93 <br /> <br />l~_r, William Goodrich <br />ATtorney at Law <br />2140 PouCh Avenue <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Rill: <br /> <br />Several months ago I copied you with same correspondence I had <br />sent ~o Sylvia Prolik concerning our contemplated plan'to replat <br />O.u%lo~ C and Lot !, Block 2, of Rum River Hills to accommodate <br />six 2-uni= ~ownhomes on ~he 4.6 acres. Sylvia responded and <br />indicate~ ~wo main conoe_~ns: Me% Council reaction- and the " <br />precedent that would 'be set. I have su~i~ed the proposal <br />.in~oz~all~ ~o ~he'~t Council and wi!! be meeting ~i%h. Sylvia <br />shortly ~o go ovar-'tha~ area. <br /> <br />The matter of precedent, however, wi!! likely involve you, and I <br />wan~ed to bring out several of the uni.c/ue characteristics of our <br />re.~uest. I do not believe that there is another area of Ramsey <br />~ha~ would mee~ al! of the criteria needed to establish any <br />ur~avorable precedent. <br /> <br />Xt is importan~ to remen~er that we are not dealing with a 4.6 <br />acre p~cel. We are dealing with one phase of a !50+ acre <br />project, and we are simply amending ~he.iand use ~or one phase - <br />:he Hul~iple Family housing phase, which we are eliminating in <br />favor of single-!amily housing. <br /> <br />2. Ordinance Bein~ Used -. <br /> <br />I~ must also be remembered r-hat %his project is DoS being done <br />under the s~bdivision ordinance, but ra~her under the PUD <br />ordinance.' For any'subsequent developer to.clai~ the right <br />the $~me ~'~armment, he-would have to be under a PUD of <br />scope and size'. .' <br /> <br /> ?CIVIL TRIAL ~P'~CJ,,kLIST <br /> <br />TH~ MINNEBOTA STATE El~l~ AS~OC;IATJON <br /> <br /> <br />