Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. William Goodrich <br />January 26, <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />Contain land acknowledged no have grandfather rights to less <br />~ha~ 1 p~r 10 acre density; <br /> <br />Be a reduction in previously approved density, rather than a <br />mere request to increase ~rom 1 in 10 acre density; <br /> <br />Contain at least 3.4 acres in high, well drained adjacent <br />land lot each lot proposed, lot use as backup dr&infield <br />area. <br /> <br />I seriously doubt ~ha= ~ny parcel in unsewered Ra~ey could come <br />=lose to meetin~ all six criteria, particularly items 4 and 5. <br />However, in =he unlikely event that some project did meet <br />six criteria, would th~= necessarily be a project =he City would <br />not count? In other words, we think =ha~ the only precedent <br />being set is a good one. <br /> <br />Res~Dec=fu!!y yours, <br />Wilbur-~. Dom, Jr. <br /> <br />~m <br /> <br /> <br />