Laserfiche WebLink
P. 3/5 <br /> <br />January 26, 1993 <br /> <br /> William Goodri:h <br />k~:orney at Law <br /> Pou,--:h Avenne <br />· moka, ~N 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Rill: <br /> <br />Several months ago I copied you wi~h some correspondence I had <br />sent to Sylvia Prolik concerning our contemplated plan'to replat <br />Outlo~ C and Lot l, Rlook 2, of Rum River ~il!s to accommodate <br />six 2-uni~ townhomes on the 4.6 acres. Sylvia responded and <br />indicate~ t-~o main conee_~-ns: Met Council reaction, and the" <br />preceden:'~hat'wou!d be set. i have sui~mitted ~he proposal <br />.Ln~ormal!y to the'Me~ Council and will be meeting ~-i~h. Sytvia <br />shortly ~o go ovar-'~hat area. <br /> <br />The matter of precedent, however, will likely involve you, and I <br />wanted to bring out several of the unique characteristics of.our <br />re.cues=. I do not believe that there is another ar~a of Ra~sey <br />that would meet all of the cri%eria needed to establish any <br />unfavorable precedent. <br /> <br />It is ~portanu to remember that we are not dealing with a 4.6 <br />acre parcel. We are dealing with one phase of a 150+ acre <br />project, and we are simply amending =he-land use !or one phase - <br />the Multiple Family housing phase, which we are e!i~inating in <br />~avor of single-lami!y housing. <br /> <br />2. Ordinance Beinc Used <br /> <br />I= must also be r~ered that ~his proJec= is no__~t being done <br />under the s~b~ivision ordinance, but rather under the PUD <br />ordinance.. ' .~o.~ any'subsequen~ developer to . cla~ =he rich=_ %o <br />the same =~a~ment, he-would have to be under a PUD of sJ_~ilar <br />scope and size-. <br /> <br /> t CIVIL TRIAL <br /> <br />Cr"RTIFI'~D BY THr' MINNr'e'~TA <br /> <br /> <br />