Agenda - Council - 03/08/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 // . I I I I I I I I I I I I William Smith, ] Transportation PI travel such as au' 10, access onto ! explained he will Commissioner H liko Associates, stated he is a consultant hired by BRW to work on Ramsey's an as well as Anoka County's. He explained he will be looking at all modes of ~°mobile, pedestrian, and bicycle. He depicted critical issues such as Highway [ighway 10, frontage road, railroad crossing, bridge, east-west routes, etc. He :also review previous studies done and work with the Planning Commission. :ndriksen inquired whether Mr. Smith was aware of the dispute regarding the actual current Tn nsportation Plan, and he explained how the County has proceeded by accepting an erroneous map,, Mr. Smith stated I~e would certainly address that in his study, and he explained that there will be'an opportunity for th~ public to review as well. Mr. Smith suggelted a subcommittee of the Commission to work with on a regular basis, and Chairperson Baw~en and Commissioners Deemer and Holland agreed to be contact persons for the consultants to work with outside of Commission meetings. Case #3: Rqquest for Preliminary Plat Approval of Chestnut Ridge; Case of John Peterson, Good Value Homes It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission to table this case until the January meeting. Case #4: ReView Proposed Ordinance to Amend Sign Regulations It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission to table this case until the January meeting. ~//Case #5: Dijcussion for Proposal Regarding Townhouses of Rum River Hills; Cajse of Wilbur Dom Zon!ng Administrator Frolik stated that on April 6, 1993 the Commission reviewed a Sketch plan for' Townhouses ~f Rum River,~I-I~lls" which proposed to replat Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot C, Rum River Hills, into ~2 townhouse lots to be served by individual on-site septic systems and wells. She explained tha~ based on Staff and Metropolitan Council's concerns, the Planning and Zoning Commission reco~nmended approval of the sketch plan with seven contingencies which are outlined in the age0da. : Wilbur Dom, developer, stated that they will not be able to comply with all seven contingencies. He explained that [~e has been unable to obtain any response from the Metropolitan Council, which is required in item[ #3 and #7, and he would like to proceed to City Council with or without the approval from the ~ommission. Commissioner He stated that was cori adriksen inquired whether the only limitation was the sewer, and Mr. Dom ect. Commissioner Dee mcr stated he saw no justification for changing the contingencies, and Mr. Dom suggested that the two items be expressed as a concern of the Commission's in which they would like City Council u address Metropolitan Council for a response. Motion by Comm~.ssioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to confirm their previous recommendation subject to seven contingencies, modifying #3 and #7 as concerns of the P&Z Commission ~ather than requirements or prerequisites. ~anning and Zoning Commission/December 7, 1993 Page 7 of 8 /0~