Laserfiche WebLink
~EB E~,~OE¢: 97 -RAitD-A~LL DEHHGOODR I CH <br /> <br />P, 3/5 <br /> <br />January 26, 1993 <br /> <br />F~. William Goodrich <br />ATtorney at Law <br />2140 Fourth Avenue <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Bill: <br /> <br />Several months ago ! copied you with some correspondence I had <br />sent to Sylvia Frotik concerning our contemplated plan'to replat <br />Outlot C and Lot 1, Block 2,. of Rum River Hills to accommodate <br />six 2-unit tow~homes on the 4.6 acres. Sylvia responded and <br />indicated.two main concerns: Met Council reaction, and the." <br />precedent tha%'would 'be set. I have submit%ed %h~ proposal <br />.in£o?malty to the' ~et Council and will be meeting with. Sylvia <br />shortly to go over"that area. <br /> <br />The matter of precedent, however, will likely involve you, and i <br />wanted to bring out several of the unique characteristics of our <br />request. I do not believe that there is another area of Ramsey <br />that would meet all of the criteria needed to establish any <br />unfavorable precedent. <br /> <br />~. Scone.of Dhe project <br />It is important ~o remember that we are not dealing with a 4.6 <br />acre parcel. We a~e dealing with one phase of a 150+ acre <br />project, and we are simply amending the-land use ~or one phase - <br />~he Multiple Family housing phase, which we are eliminating in <br />favor of single-family housing. <br /> <br />~. Ordinance Being Use~ <br /> <br />It must also be remembered that this project is not being done <br />under the s~bdivision ordinance, but rather under the PUD <br />ordinance.' For any'subsequent developer to.claim the right %o <br />the same t~atment, he-would have to ~e under a PUD of similar <br />scope and size'. <br /> <br />'r CIVIL TRIAL ~.PE:-CIALIST <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />