My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
09/27/11
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09/27/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 11:05:20 AM
Creation date
9/28/2011 2:23:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
09/27/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The secondary question is at what point is there not enough cash flow or tax increment to pay <br />PNC the first mortgage. <br />There was discussion that if they need a third source that it rather not be the City. <br />Ms. Kvilvang continued with when they cannot pay the first mortgage to PNC, that issues a <br />concern. That would mean revenues would have to be 35% less than what they are anticipating. <br />That would mean the average rent would have to be .88 per square foot. This is not a realistic or <br />possible scenario. <br />Ms. Kvilvang reviewed that construction starts in 2012, first occupancy in 2013. Construction <br />goes about 12-18 months, occupancy 18-24 months to full 93% occupied essentially. The COR <br />apartments present value is at $2.4 million at 24 years of tax increments. The clock starts <br />clicking on your TIF District in 2012. You take 15% of increment, generating first to go to the <br />City, HRA. The annual net to the project is $220,000. <br />Ms. Kvilvang stated the HRA has the choice that if you don't take the first 15%, you can use all <br />of 100% to debt service; the $220,000 would increase to $260,000. These are all future <br />decisions that need to be made. <br />Ms. Kvilvang reviewed that the Allina and VA present value of tax increment is about $1.9 <br />million. That's a value of $11.5 million property valuation for tax purposes. That's 25 years of <br />TIF and taking the first 10% for administration. That would be about $181,000 available for <br />service debt. If you choose not to take 10%, that number would increase to around $202,000. <br />Ms. Kvilvang reviewed the revenue as presented. The years that you care about is years 2016 <br />and 2017. Operating revenues as presented and NOI in 2016 of about $2.1 million, COR TIF, <br />$220,000 total income of available for debt service of 2.3 million; first mortgage of $1.4 million <br />TIF bond payments. The cash flow after fact is $330,000, based on $2.5 million of additional <br />equity. <br />Chairperson Elvig stated what was just reviewed was at the $1.25 per sq ft. <br />Ms. Kvilvang discussed the next is at $1.06 per sq ft. This is 15% less than presented. Looking <br />at 2016, the bottom line is $1.8 million for debt service. That cash flow is a negative. The first <br />year you would have to draw on the Allina or VA. Of that $181,000 available, you would need <br />$142,000 of it. <br />Chairperson Elvig asked if we do a three and three opposed to 3 and 23, does that rate still jump <br />up double to the 571. <br />Ms. Kvilvang responded no, it is going to be interest only. Then the discussion would be what <br />do we capitalize and what revenues are coming in. <br />Elvig asked if it's three and three, what does the 571 come down to. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / July 19, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.