My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
09/27/11
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09/27/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 11:05:20 AM
Creation date
9/28/2011 2:23:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
09/27/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Kvilvang stated it's similar to where it is current, a couple hundred thousand. <br />The worst -case scenario, of 30%, total income in 2016 available for debt service of $1.3 million, <br />PNC loan payment is $1.4 million. Even once you bring in the TIF from Allina and VA there <br />still would not be enough to pay city bond portion. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated even at that point we are still servicing the debt on our bond. If we <br />went out with the TIF is there zero risk for six years. <br />Chairperson Elvig asked are we are still collecting $266,000 from them. <br />Commissioner Ramsey asked are we still going to be able to pay our bond. <br />Mr. Lazan commented to the discussion that the $1.06 scenario assumes they are expecting us to <br />cover a short-term loan. They are still in at $2 million plus operating, personal and corporate <br />guarantees; they are going to look to fill that gap before they ever default. <br />Chairperson Elvig stated then what we are asking for is another $2 million so they are in it for $4 <br />million. They are not going to walk way from $4 million. <br />Commissioner McGlone commented that these scenarios don't contemplate any other <br />developments happening or having any other TIF revenues. <br />Ms. Kvilvang felt they had enough income generated that it is going to cover your obligations. <br />HRA Executive Director Nelson asked if there is any concerns with regard to the bonding that is <br />being proposed. As long as there is general consensus to proceed on that note, we would like to <br />get back to Flaherty and Collins, stating what our offer is. <br />Councilmember Wise asked why they want to see substantial construction of the train station. <br />Mr. Lazan stated it has been their concern all along because this is part of this project. <br />Councilmember Tossey has questions on the bonding of the TIF District, and coming up with the <br />money for the train station. He expressed concern about us restricting our bonding authority <br />within the TIF District. Is this going to affect us? <br />Ms. Kvilvang stated based on this analysis, if we assume worst cast scenario of 15% less <br />revenues, we will not be able to use that increment from the VA or Allina for anything else, <br />setting that aside and waiting to year three to see if it's taken out so you have that protection. In <br />the next 12 -24 months, other development may happen in The COR, and we would have the <br />capacity to bond for more. <br />Councilmember Tossey asked what is the restriction on how much we can bond over the revenue <br />that we know that is coming into the district. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / July 19, 2011 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.