Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #._~_ <br /> <br />WASTE MANAGEMENT OF MINNESOTA, INC. SKI HILL AGREEMENT <br /> By: City Administrator Ryan Schroeder <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the June 14, 1994 City Council meeting, Staff was directed to meet with Waste Management of <br />Minnesota, Inc. (WMMI) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA) toward clarification <br />of 1994 legislative changes impacting the Ski Hill Agreement. On August 2, 1994, <br />Councilmember Peterson and City Administrator Schroeder met with Art Dunn of the PCA and <br />Don Otter, Steve Kollodge and the Corporate Counsel from WMMI. <br /> <br />Represented at the meeting was the following: <br /> <br />WMMI would be open to deeding over property on the north side of the landfill, somewhat <br />different or larger than 50 acres if the City demonstrated the need. <br /> <br />The PCA is not concerned, from an environmental standpoint, about areas upgradient from <br />the landfill. Environn~ental liens will not be an issue so long as WMMI applies with the <br />PCA for a transfer agreement excluding these areas; methane ruination north of the landfill <br />is not a concern. <br /> <br />The state has a myriad of issues to work out relative to landfill transfers, but for the most <br />part Ramsey's concerns are not an issue. <br /> <br />An exception is that the ['CA would not sign off on City ownership of the Sunwood Drive <br />right-of-way until the3, evaluate methane and ground water issues in that area more closely. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The long-!erm reuse of property south of the landfill.is in question. The PCA would not <br />allow prix/ate well and septic systems or a use of the property which may someday cause <br />the State to expend additional mitigation dollars [i.e. housing or refineries]. They are not <br />sure of imPacts on the methane project. <br /> <br />The PCA will have sent out notices to all qualifying landfills of their process by September 1, <br />1994. After this, they will negotiate agreements with all landfills wishing to participate in the State <br />opportunity to acquire ownership of all pem~itted property. <br /> <br />WMMI has represented a belief that the Ski Hill Agreement clearly states that Ramsey accepts <br />either the 50 acres or the ski hill. Further, that such being the case, Ramsey does not have any <br />legal standing in ~ request for additional value beyond the 50-acre parcel. They have presented, <br />however, that they will work with Ramsey on configuration of the parcel, or expansion if needed, <br />to fit a ballfield or similar improvement on the property. <br /> <br />At the time of preparation of this agenda case, Staff had not had an opportunity to discuss the legal <br />issues with Attorney Goodrich. He will be asked to prepare an opinion for the Council meeting. <br /> <br />On August 11, 1994, the Park and Recreation Commission will be discussing the 1995 - 2000 <br />Capital Improvements Plan. It is expected that they will again request that the property south of <br />· 153rd Avenue N.W. be programmed for an active recreational use in the future. It is the Staff <br />position that once municipal services reach the area, the property north of 153rd be sold for <br />residential development in order to fund development of the park area. A conservative estimate of <br />available revenuerfrom land sale and park dedication is $220,000, in 1994 dollars. The attached <br />draft plan details four baseball/softball fields, a tennis court, ice rink, two soccer/football fields and <br /> <br /> <br />