Laserfiche WebLink
~ wa~e ~anapernen', ~omDan,~ <br /> <br />Surface wa%er drainage from the north and west sides of <br />the Landfill will me diver%ed into the sedimentation <br />basin on the north side of ~he landfill. The basin has <br />been sized for ~he 25 year 24 hour storm event, an <br />overfloF ~'ill be provided in the sedimentation basin that <br />will discharge ~o the existing pond on the north side of <br />the Landfill. These features can be seen on s~eet <br />of the ~er~ical Expansion plans da~ed O~ober <br />Drainage ~rom ~he Landfill should not impac~ park areas. <br /> <br />WM~[I wi!! provide grading for arainage purposes as <br />out!ine~ on plan sheet A-!~ of the vertical expansion <br />plans da~ed October !988 for res%oration of the borrow' <br />area. We ~i!l place 3-4 inches of native ~opsoil on <br />borro~ area and seed ~ith a perennial grass seed mi~ure. <br /> <br />Data contained in the !993 Annual Report shows ~hat <br />groundwater in the ~rea of the 50 acre parcel ~as at an <br />approximate elevation of 867 ~t ESL. The base elevation <br /> <br />7 feec ~bove the ground ~a%er. W~en %he borro~ area was <br />designed the reuuirement ~as ~nat the base elevation <br />should no5 be ~i~hin ~~ ~ee% cf the high cround~ater <br />elevation. <br /> <br />A ska~img area appears %o be a 'good idea for the <br />recreational parme!; however, any special gradinG <br />develop ~is ~-: ~ :--' 'would be =~ ~he ~- ' <br />if-. ~he Skating are '~ere ~o be ex,ava%ed %~ ~round;'a~er <br /> <br />The deve~lopman~ cf a skf ~rai! is another good idea, but <br />a~ain, any ~ree removal or gradin~ ~or ~h~;.__ prcje--~ would <br />have to be at %he CiTy's e>rpense. If possible <br />innends ~o marken and/or develop additional land at =he <br />Landfill. ~=__ the ski -r-i!, = -would be expanded beyond ~he <br /> <br />pendinG <br /> <br />Where the waZk~av, encroaches on. <br />area a~ ~he no--~hwes~ corner .of ~he Landfill we are <br /> ~_~n~ to gran~ ~he C~y an easemen~ fo~ ~is purpose, <br />again,_.:f we are able to do so in ~i~h~. of %he _pending <br />legislation. <br /> <br />W~[I disagrees tha~ the 23 acre parcel has no value and <br />have no~ probie~ ~ith retaining o%~ership cf ~his <br />properTy~ Sc long as it is no% ~ransferred %0 the S~ate <br />per %he ~roDosed %ec~s!a%ion <br /> <br /> <br />