Laserfiche WebLink
C1~ Afimimstrator Schroe, der stated that dxis would provide for a four-year program with <br />an msscssment cap of $,4,000 with ~. four-year cost of approximately $71,000. <br /> <br />Mayor Gilbe~son a~ead ~dth Councfimemb~r Peterson that the street lighting is aisc <br />impor&nt_ <br /> <br />2',ir. 3a_nkowskd felt that a tot of the projects would happen without subsidy but some will <br />not because of the hi~ cost. <br /> <br />CounciL.member Hardin inquired if M_r. fankowstd had spoken with an)' of the ~feeted <br />residents to which ,Mr. Ja_mkowski renlied that no formnl survey had been done. <br />Cotmciimcmber td_s_rdXn then suggested that thc first course, of action should be to send a <br />letter to ail the pc. opic in the projects a_nd see what the response is without offering a <br />subsidy. Hesu~s,~o,~*- ~ ' mrs' ' pro,am be ~m-'sued. and that the easier projects be "melded" <br />fa:st. <br /> <br />~-. Schr~der felt thee'it is 'veu, ~neficial rs the CiO' to get these streets paved. The intent' <br />is to c]iminate tine high cost of road maintenancz. The program will not eliminate a road <br />grader but it will keep from having to replace one, <br /> <br />Counciimember Peterson stated he has a problem with the subsidizing, He stated that <br />r:-, .'oDe)' '+kn_tt 08. LEkKgn L-O~:i D~DDIe who have a..t.rcaoy ~a2a m.u re,ce, for trent .-$'rojscts. <br /> <br />Cou2ciLmember ZLmmerm~n stated that the unsaved roads have conMbuted to a street <br />sweeoer and the Dared roads are conu-dbufi.ng to thc ~-ader. He suggesmd going with the <br />S4,0(~K) can. <br /> <br />Comnci!member }z2.rdin stated ~at the tftdmate goa.! is to get sJJ the str'~ets saved s_nd that <br />they should ~ nursued based uoon intemsL <br /> <br />Modon by Councfimember Peterson a_nd scconde, d by Cc~'uncilmember Hardin to di~t fine <br />Ci5, En~.dmeer to solicit info~,~adon about the willingness to proceed with the paving of <br />sn-eets. Have the residents respond within 30 days mhd enclose a self-address~, st~msed <br />envciope for theh- convenience. Tins case should be brought back to fine Road and Bridge <br />Commit'tee in Mm-ch and then ~.vo~yc.d to Ciw Council <br /> <br />Motion cm.nried,. \;o~-~g Yes: Mayor Gil~r'-~on, Coumcilmembers Peterson, Ha'-dLn, Beycr <br />a_nd Zbnrnerma.n. Voting .No: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Jzn2,zowsid stated that the Road and Bridge Commines a2so d2scussed the selection of <br />~n aiig-r~mcnt for Sunwood Drive mhd that there are envL-onment~l issues involve, d with thc <br />wetlands. He summ~..-ized the alig-nments and a2temzfives, i--ne Pla.nm.ne and Zoning <br />Commission, thc Road and Bridge Comminee, and the Dcnarnment of .Nat-m-a.1 Resources <br />have indicated a p~ftrtnce ~o go v,dff,n the no, em s!i~'~?m:n~nt. Mr. Jankowski asked for a <br />recommendation so thc consulting enp..neer Cotfid proceed with thc permJ. F-Zn, g stage and <br />obr. fi. nmg the mght-of-ways. <br /> <br />Mr. Sch_roeder stated ~at the Road and Bridge Comm~t1~, £ recommendation is to not <br /> ,ow~s~ ~nc~ option. I nc~ is a chics me lowest pfic~ ~tc~afive would <br /> <br />Motion by Counc;Jmember Zimme_~an a~nd seconded by Counciimember Pemrson to <br />; ~omm~nu A2i~ments iA and 2B for the p,a.~oses of pm-mimng smd to o_m-ect that tine <br />prozess proceed. <br /> <br />City Council/January 18, 1994 <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />