Laserfiche WebLink
City Engineer Jaakowsici commenwxt that the DNR has been more resmctive with regard to <br />wetlands. He s~ted he would like to invite a representative of thc permit review agencies <br />to allow input an~ comrr~nt on ail the propos~ aliglU:nents. <br /> <br />M_r. Raadkka statczi that Alignment 2A (west half of the pro]e~t) is deficient for site distance <br />coming to the lefL ALignment 2B is deficient in both situations - the Northeast and the <br />Southwest Quadrant_ ALignment 2C is deficient in a couple of areas. The southern one is <br />very deficient for~site distance. <br /> <br />Mr. Schro~der stated that Alignment 2B is a $70,000 increase from Alignment 2A. He <br />inquired if the der_iSciencies could be resolved with less cost by rrmybe purring a turn lane on <br />the County Road.; <br /> <br />Mr. Raadkk. a sea;ted that if the speed limit is reduced to 45 miles per hour, it would be <br />within the limitm Iqe stated that the mitigation of the wetland would equal 1/'2 acre; <br />however, the majbr impact would be the cost. <br /> <br />Council_member ~qmmerman felt that the alignment h~ a good right angle intersection so <br />$70,CO0 was not ~at much mom. Hr. felt l. hat for safer)' sa. kc, the c~-~.n~,~ route would be <br />the best. He Stat'r~d that the secondary proposal would be the "green" route. The "yellow" <br />route is too deficient to even think about. <br /> <br />Mr. Schrc>eder stated that money would come from MSA and assessments. He inquired if <br />parr of the wa}, ahd the "green" roum the rest of the wa),. <br /> <br />Consensus of th~ Committee was to recommend lA and 2B as the alignments and to <br />proceed with the permimng process. <br /> <br />Case # i: Slfreet Paving Program <br /> <br />CiD' Administrator Schrcw~der stated that the Council had rabied the discussion of this <br />'program pend.m.,~ receim of more information. CiD' Engd.neer Jankowski has furnished <br />haem with that mformar~on. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Commktee was to recommend that the Council set the level of the <br />subsidy cap a_nd i/re. ct the City Engine:r m prepare the necessary resolutions ro imriam the <br />1994 projects untier the Street Paging }:h"ogra, m <br /> <br />Case #2: A!~sessment Procedure <br /> <br />CiD' Administrator Schroeder suggested that the Committee may warn ro table this case <br />until there is morg rime for discussion. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Consensus of the Commi nee was 'to adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />%ne re~m.:dm- ,-,' ' ,, <br /> m~,~ .mn,, of the Road and Bridge Comm~t-[~ al~jourTle, d at (5:0! p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully subr~irrexi /.,~ <br /> <br /> ,.'0o Tkie~ng"---~ '; <br />(,..~e.~rding~ $ ~"re* ~mrY R ca d <br /> <br /> ../7-'~ StOVen J ankoCz~ki <br />~.~ CiD, Engfineer <br /> Bridge/January 18, 1994 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />,,41 <br /> <br /> <br />