My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08/22/94
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1994
>
08/22/94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2025 4:28:29 PM
Creation date
10/20/2003 10:13:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road and Bridge Committee
Document Date
08/22/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
maximum of 750 trips per day. A "no build" ahemafive is thus not an option. <br /> <br />The City has reviewed a variety of possible alignments in order to find the alignment that <br />would best fit with the community's needs and the environmental concerns of the area. <br />This alignment proves to best fit this criteria. <br /> <br />Steep Slopes and Soils: <br /> <br />The slopes south of Sunfish Lake var>, from approximately a 9 percent slope on the west to <br />approximately 16 percent at the steepest portion. With the proposed alignment a portion of <br />the hillside would be cleared and appropriate grades would be cut. Cut materials will be <br />used to balance fil! requirements elsewhere within the project. A segment of this roadway <br />may require retaining walls for a distance of 400', more or less. As design phases <br />proceed, the extent of wall verses ~ading will become clearer. In an3' event, the proposed <br />construction will include slope stabilization through grading, retaining wall(s) as <br />appropriate, and revegetafion. An unfortunate result of the WCA, but common occurrence <br />with projects, is that woodlands are being sacrificed in order to avoid or minirrfize wetland <br />impacts, regardless of the functional ',,',due of the particular wetland. <br /> <br />III. CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The proposed project wilt meet all MPCA, DNR, and Corps of Engineers requirements and <br />standards. Areas which could have had a potential for significant environmental effects have been <br />identified and evaluated, No potentially significant negative impacts were identified; therefore, no <br />environmental impact statement is required. <br /> <br />Based on the finddngs and conclusions contained herein and in the reference documents, including <br />all comments received in the environmental assessment worksheet, the City of Ra.msey determ2ned <br />on August 22, 1994, that an environmental impact statement is not required on the proposed <br />project. <br /> <br />Mayor <br /> <br />,fro <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.