Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />Extending ~CR 116 (Industry Avenue) on a bridge across the Rum River into the City <br />of Anoka Has identified as an issue in 1980. Consistent with this strategy was major <br />arterial deC,gnat,on for Industry Avenue. <br /> <br />The Anoka. County Thoroughfare Plan identified an additional Rum River crossing <br />along the 1.56th Avenue alignment. After crossing the river, the road would swing <br />north to follow 161st Avenue to the east. <br /> <br />Existing road design standards were identified in the Plan and new standards were <br />recommen~led for adoption: <br /> New roads must be surfaced with an impervious surface <br /> Co~crete curb and gutter will be required on all MSA streets (CSAH 22, CR 27, <br /> an~ CR 7) <br /> Right-of-way widths (in feet) <br /> <br /> OLD NEW <br />· Principal 300 <br />· Thoroughfare 150 100 - 300 <br />(Intermediate Arterial) <br />· lViinor Arterial 66 80 - 100 <br />· Collector 80 80 <br />· Local 66 <br />· Cul-de-sac 65 radius <br />· Service 66 <br /> <br />Public Transportation: <br /> <br />It was recognized in the 1980 Plan that the City of Ramsey is outside the Metropolitan <br />T~¢ing District. ',As a result, the tax rate for transit services in tLamsey is less than the rate <br />within the Taxinl~ District; .125 mills compared to 1.25 mills in 1980. Metropolitan Transit <br />Commission (MTn) freed route services are not provided to comm-nities that are outside the <br />Ta~ng District, and legislative action would be required to include Ramsey in the District. <br /> <br />MTC paratrausit services, based in Ramsey, were available in 1980. The paratransit services <br />were rideshare programs that included the follo~dng: <br /> <br />· MTC would help organize car pools <br />· MTC would offer vans and free newspaper advertising space to fred riders' <br /> <br />It was suggestedi in the Plan that the City should make its parking lot (at the m-nlcipal <br />building) available to commuters for a park-and-ride lot. The Plan explained that if the City <br />received a favorable response from park-and-ride patrons, it could apply to Mn/DOT for <br /> <br />Working paper #1 <br />City of Ramsay Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Transportation Plan Element <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />