01/04/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I Motion carrier. Noting Yes: ChaJrp~r~n I-l~ndriks~n, Board Members T~'ry, Bawden, D~mer, Holl~nct, LaDu~ .,~nd Thorud. Voting No: Non~. Motion by Boa~ Member D~mer and sw. onded by Board Member Ten'y to delet~ ~ because it do~s not apply. Fm'ther Dis~ussi°n: Board Member D~m~ sta~..d this is not a double frontage lot b~ause the lot do~s not have 20~ fe~t on two streets. Zoning Administrator Prollk stated that ther~ is not 200 feet lot width but th~ is frontage. Motion failed. Vpting Yes: Ch~n Hendriksen, Board Member D~m~ and Terry. Voting No: Board Mem~rs Bawden, Holland, LaDu¢ and Thom& Motion by Board ~vlember D~n~r and secon~ by Board Member Terry to amend ~ to delete the wording "but access is obsumcmd by a county ditch." Amendment by Board Member Bawden and second~l by Board Member Holland to change thc wording to read "~.. but access on the proposc~d building sim is obswacted by a county ditch..." .~ . Amendment cartel Vonng Yes: Board Members Bawden, Holland, LaDuc, Terry and Thomd. Voting No: Chair~rson I-Iendriksen and Board Member D~m~r. Motion carrie~ ~oting Yes: Chairperson Hcndfiksen, Board Members Deemer, Teng', Bawden, I-Iolland, LaDuc ahd Thorud. Voting No: None. Motion by Chairl~son Hendriksen and s~conded by Board Member Deemer to add #6A to read "Tncr~ ar~ many building sites suitable on this parcel that do not recluir~ access across a county ditch." Motion carried, iVoting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Members Deemer, Bawdcn, Flolland, Terry ant Thom& Voting No: Board Member LaDU¢. Motion by Board Member Terry and seconded by Board Member Deemer to delete #7 because it is irrelevant. I I I I I Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Members Terry, Deemer, and Thomd. Voting ND: Board Members Bawden, Holland and LaDu¢. Motion by Chairp~, on Hendriksen and seconded by Board Member Deemer to add a finding to read 'That a representative of the applicant stated at the public hearing that the need for the variance was economic in n[tmre because of the cost of extending and improving Osmium Street in order to provide the minim ,ira legal frontage on a public road." Motion carrie& V~ting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Deemer, Bawden, and Terry. Voting No: Board Members LaDue and Thorud. Abstaining: Board Member Holland. Motion by Board l~Iember Deemer and seconded by Chairperson Hendriksen to delete #8 because them is no hardskil~. Motion failed. Volling Yes: Board Member D~emer, Hendrikscn, and Terry. Voting No: Board Members Bawden,,:~-Iolland, LaDue and Thomd. [J I I Board of Adjustment/September 7, 1993 Page 3 of 7