My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2011
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:18:57 AM
Creation date
12/8/2011 4:06:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
12/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson McGlone and Councilmembers Elvig and Backous. <br />Voting No: None. <br />Case #3: Consider Policy on Turf Establishment Related to City Improvement <br />Projects <br />City Engineer Himmer reviewed the staff report. <br />Chairperson McGlone stated his support to require sod since it has roots to quickly establish turf <br />and address erosion. He felt requiring sod would result in fewer headaches in the long run and <br />the City can assure the contractor is meeting specifications. <br />Councilmember Backous stated he was thrilled with this proposal, which will be more costly up <br />front but save staff time and residents will be happy with it. <br />City Engineer Himmer explained that ditches are to promote infiltration so staff suggests not <br />using costly soil. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked whether the requirement of 4 inches of topsoil is overkill. He stated <br />in his yard he put down one-half inch of topsoil and his yard is now more green than others in the <br />neighborhood. Councilmember Elvig suggested talking with contractors about salvage dirt and <br />the need to pick out rocks. He stated he understands the need to address erosion but was <br />concerned that property owners would not take care of sod. To keep it affordable, he suggested <br />the seed be sown, not broadcast, and watered every 2-3 days to assure it will grow. <br />City Engineer Himmer stated sod is a good means of erosion control and this specification, <br />whether seed or sod, requires the contractor to water it for 30 days. In 30 days, sod will be <br />established but it takes longer for seed to be established. City Engineer Himmer stated staff <br />talked about the impact of salt and sand during the winter months and whether it was the <br />contractor's or homeowner's responsibility to cut out and replace that sod. He noted that sod <br />gets rid of the concern with rocks. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked what is the cost between sod and seed. <br />Public Works Director Olson estimated the cost on Ute Street was $300-$500 per address. He <br />noted the specifications for that project tried to make it as affordable as possible to get the <br />project done. Residents were offered $200 to salvage top soil. The area was seeded and steeper <br />areas were hydro seeded. Public Works Director Olson noted a picture can be taken at the end of <br />the project to show turf has been established. With regard to sod damaged by road salt, he asked <br />why the contractor should not be required to replace it since a 12-month warranty is required. <br />City Engineer Himmer reviewed the cost of sod and seed, noting both require topsoil. <br />Councilmember Elvig asked whether 4 inches of top soil would be required for sod. <br />Public Works Committee / November 15, 2011 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.