04/05/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Pending Pending Complete 1~14/93 1~14/93 3/,17/94 Monthly Status Report Execute Resolution ~t93-12-295 (Beyer~immerman/All) approving the request for. a L-~P, as amended, from IPS based upon the Findings of Fact Council voted that the "fine-tuning" of the indemnification agreement for the IPS Conditional Use Permit should be done by the City Attorney and.the Finance Officer. Findings of Fact - Bill Dubats' (Lakeview Enterprise, Inc.) request for a variance from side yard setback requirements and impervious surface area restrictions: The Board of Adjusmaent approved 1-8, and 10-I 1, and directed Staff to amend the following: (9) "... and thc Applicant has proposed a drainage plan that provides for a detention volume consisting of a water retention and sedimentation system that will limit the surface water discharged from the Subject ProperS. into the existing storm water system to 1.7 cfa, and Apphcant has stated that he will further restrict the surface water discharged from the Subject Property into the existing storm water system to that which would normally be expected if the property was developed with 30% impervious, surface area." Add 10A to read "That even though minutes reflect there was verbal approval by the Department of Natural Resources for the variance granted in 1986 for Lot 2, Block 3, Riverside West, there is no documentation of such." (12) "... is an expansion of the development that has occurred on Lots 1 and 2; and d) City Code requires that in the commercial district all off- street parking, driveways, and maneuvering areas be paved and curbed." Add #12A to read "That the proposed coverage of the lot by buildings is approximately 30% which would be permitted by the B-3 Highway Business District." (13) "That the special conditions causing fl~e undue hardship do not result from the actions of the Applicant." .(14) '"l'~nat such variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right..." (15) 'q'"nat if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privilege...' (16) "That if granted, the variance will not' be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Ramsey Zoning Chapter . . ." (17) "That if granted, the variance will not substantially increase the congestion of public streets .... "Add #18 to read "That the Applicant has stated he will submit and implement drainage plans which call for on-site retention/percolation of run-off water for 40% of the impervious surface area and on-site retention/sedimentation of run-off from the remaining 60% impervious surface m-ca with discharge to the municipal storm sewer system restricted to 1.3 cfs, such figure being the estimated flow resulting from a 30% impervious coverage." Also add the wording "secjimentation and sldmmirtg" in #18. Add #19 to-read "That'the Subject Property, by the City Engineer's estimate and the accompanying letters submitted in the publie hearing xvm~ord, is entitled to. a surface water discharge of 1.7 els to the already approved existing City storm water system discharging into the Mississippi River." Add #20 to read "That the Subject Property cannot be put to a reasonable use under the 30% impervious axea restriction considering its present commercial zoning and valuation." Add #21 to read "That in granting this 88% impervious variance, it complies with the intent of the Wild and Scenic River Act and the Critical Area Designation Executive Order