|
Ramsey Land Use/Transportation Corridor ·
<br /> · 4/18/94 · page6
<br />
<br />,'%.~- '.'(.:-L' .'~, City'°f Raresey PropOsed Criteria ' ':- ". ~:".. ......~'" -~' · .: '.-' ) -r-i
<br /> ,,,~-:.':i:': ?. i~'''- for MississiPpi Ri;qer Bridge -- - . ' : .. :'-'. ~ · ' ' - ' .' .' . -.
<br />-.):i.-;-- :-', i--:'-: i::--.'-1:}'~ ."..'. "Any M~Ssisdppi River bridge crrssingShould attemPt to-minimize the" '
<br />~'::( ;_' :'ir ,),-.i::il;:(!,-:r.(ii..' :-" ..)'. ;,.-_. ~. environmental impacts on the lvlississippi River specifically and its Surrounding
<br /> environs and"built environment!' in general. ' ,
<br />': :"/:,-i~'-.:":" '_:::. i,.'~:,.._'.'.;,) .-.'- i - .,.'~i ~..:, :-,. · '.'.. ' :,:.'i "'. : ' ' '
<br />· ':,'(': ~'- :. ;/. "'" .'-'~ - 5.~ Any MississipPi River bridge crossing should minimize the need for Right-Of- . . .
<br />-i:".:,(: ~:,":-::: : :5 ':"-!'.'. '"" . Way (ROW) acquisition......, '.'.-' ," ' 5'. :'. ').-, ,-.,' '..: (:. - - ·
<br />
<br />-:)- '," :": ': ,':3. 'Any MississipPi River bridge crossing should minimize the potential, to impact
<br />· ' " the existing railroad corridor.: · ·: :. ', . . . - ' · '- ' '
<br />
<br /> ' '. _. . -.:' - ' 42' Any Mississippi River bridge. , Cr~siing Should minimize impact'on existing ·
<br /> '""-', ': ".' ,' " residentialneighbori~oods. ' --""-: ' ." .-:..'-' -,,' -" ' - . ' .
<br />
<br /> ': '): ."- ':" '"" :" "" 5. Any Mississippi River bridge ~rossing;Sh0uld terminate at an'east-west
<br /> · ' -,.'.:- '- .... · collector road in the City.0fRamsey: "." '-' ' ,"- "'"
<br />
<br /> - - 6. Any Mississippi River bridge Crossing should be built from a source of'
<br /> ~. .... .-. ,...:~'. .. multijurisdictionalfunds. , .....
<br />' ' '., .. .. -~.: ..', ".'."-'.:.';. - ~-'_L'i '-.'.~ '-':,:: i" ,'. ' ' . ' ' "~' :':'5.' "~ ~:':'-''. '.'::.:~
<br />- -'-.~'~.. 7. ' Any'MississiPpiRiverbridge~rbssingshould att~mpt;c0incorP°ratean0rtfi' ~·-'"' '.:' '
<br /> ' ' . : frontage road along TH-10.'" ' .- ,i '-" '
<br />
<br /> - ':' -. '-..: Table 1 below compares ihe Separate bridge corrido/' alignments listed using the revised goals .... .-
<br /> ":'-' "i'and criteria.: This table is illustrative in:nature. The City Will want to develop a similar table's': :~- :: ' ' -
<br /> .: ': 7-i .'.-,(When discu~singactual bridge crossifig'corvidors. - ..... : ' ' .:' . .... ',. ?. · .'
<br />
<br />~ ;. )': /; :')-: ~_'..-:'.·.-·"-~ . -·~:...:"..-..~ .: ::' "-. ·,-~-..:' . ..~"..:~;·:·'. :...~..·~)',;:.: :'.:r"i·.! ~.i".:'.-i .-:... :·i '..:;/'.-..
<br /> · : -..'~: '~ '":' '...:. ':' .,"- ' . -'. ' ' , ''... '.:',-' - ...... ..,--i,' \ .'-:' -:-'~' :..-' . -.' '-. ....Y"~." · . ' . ', ':
<br />
<br />
<br />
|