07/05/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

wa~., shall be tess than 36 inches in holt:he. Thc developer should also work oui the details of this scr~nm~ plan for identificaUon in the development permit. Archhecmral S,,andards: City Code requires the,, in the lndusudal District, exterior trashes be of mamnaJ other than metal on 50% of the exposed wails. "Fne building exterior is proposed to bt rock face concrete block and the building front will be finished off with a mer,,:q.! facia; this proposal is in accordance with City, Coda. x\:asw S~oragz; Ciw Code requires that all solid waste and refuse receptacles shall bs stored within a compietely screened smacture or container. Tnt site plan does not md. icate a waste storage area in accordance with City Code and the plan should be amended accordmg)y. Off Swee! Par~,,dn2 - Design: tn accord~mce with CiD' Code, the off-s:eet parking are. as proposed ~o consist of a bituminous ca,acing. For off-str~ p~kin~ ar~as, City Co6~ re~u~s a 3 foot s~t~ack from road right-of-ways. Th~ proposed off-s=~t p~king ~ proposed to b~ s~t back 20-22 feet from road ~ht-of-ways. City Cod~ th~ bhu~nous su~acing b~ finished wj~ conffnuous concrete curb. Th~ sit~ plan proposes ptacm~ con~t~ c~bin~ ~ound th~ p~fim~t~r of c~stomer/~mploy~ p~km~ ~sas but it do~s not show curbm~ th~ oumr ps~mr of ~ inmfior loa~ ~a. Th~ sit~ p~ mus~ b~ co~cted accor~ng)}' and it is not ~ficipa~ that th~ City would ~xp~ct th~ ]oa~ng ~sa to b~ c~b~ until thz fin~ nhass of ~a dsv~]opmsnt. Off S~ee: Parkfins - Spaces Reo~u'.,red: City Cods reouires I partdng snace for each empioyee on me maximum working shift. Phase t proposes to employ 20 persons and provides S2 par~dng spaces; Phase Ii proposes to employ 16 persons and provides 28 proffering ssaces; Phase Ill proposes to employ 20 persons and provides 48 partdng ssaces. The deveJoper wi5 have to r)rovide parking ssaces that will be designated for handicapped use in accord2mce w/t/n me .4merican Disabfiiries Act. Loadin~ Area: Ciw Code reouires a minimum of two ioaciing docks for fne size facility proposed; each loa~/n~ dock should measure at least 12' x 60'. h appears that the loading docks are no~ proposed to be constructed unffi the third phase of the development. Staff would assume that the inte~or loading area is nor proposed to be saved unri! the third and final nhase of the building construction. In addition, n'uck n-aff~c is no', supposed to be routed through customer/employee p~-king areas. St~f ques~ons how the developer proposes to provide =-uck rrar~hc with a pav~ access to a paved loading area until Phase 1S conslYuCte~. Lighting: The exter/or lighting plan is shown on the site nian. and is acceptable. Any iighmng used ~o illuminate the site should be a~'-ranged to dehect iigh: away from adiacent properties and roadways. Drainage: No drainage or ~ading plans have been Crovide& A topo~aphic map indicates the: 15 feet of elevation difference exists across ibc site, with a lowest point along the southern property line. h is recommended that a sum¢ area be constructed along this southern bounda~'T having s~fficient capacity to provera runoff from leaving the prope~y bounda:-ies.