Laserfiche WebLink
Monthly Status Report <br /> <br />Pending/ <br />Jankowski <br /> <br />Complete <br /> <br />Complete <br /> <br />Pending/ <br />Goodrich <br /> <br />Complete <br /> <br />Complete <br /> <br />Complete <br /> <br />Pending/ <br />Boos <br /> <br />Pending <br /> <br />8/2/94 <br /> <br />8/2/94 <br /> <br />8/2/94 <br /> <br />812/94 <br /> <br />8/11/94 <br /> <br />8/11/94 <br /> <br />8/11/94 <br /> <br />8/11/94 <br /> <br />9/15/94 <br /> <br />Place the thoroughfare setbacks on a subsequent Planning <br />Commission agenda for discussion to reclassify Ramsey's road <br />system from that of the County's plan and formulate appropriate <br />thoroughfare setbacks accordingly. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission felt that the proposed resolution <br />establishing criteria for consideration of development outside the <br />MUSA was confusing and suggested rewording to make it easier <br />reading. Council and Staff determined not to adopt criteria but <br />rather consider proposals on a case-by-case basis, <br /> <br />Discussion of an architectural review ordinance has beers pending <br />since 8/27/92, and the Planning Commission would like a review of <br />Council's workshop minutes to detem'fine the need for such action. <br /> <br />A Kentucky case was noted in the Zoning Bulletin wherein it was <br />decided that city council is required to wait until receipt of the <br />commission's minutes are approved and made part of the public <br />record before it can make any decision concerning adoption of a <br />recommended ordinance. Please review for any application to <br />Ramsey's current adoption process. To carry this a step further, is <br />it appropriate or legally sound for City Council to take action on a <br />application for a conditional use permit, for example, without <br />benefit of approved Planning Commission public hearing minutes <br />being provided in their case back-up materials? If not, then not <br />forwarding a case to the Council before we have approved Planning <br />Commission minutes could add another 4-6 minimum weeks of <br />processing time to the case. <br /> <br />Attach the letter received from Chuck Detaney, dated August 9, <br />1994, as part of public hearinb record for North Fork, lnc.'s <br />request for preliminary plat approval of Northfork Oaks. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted to recommend that City Council <br />grant preliminary plat approval of Northfork Oaks based on <br />discussions with the Planning Commission and the developer on <br />August 11, 1994 and City Staff review letter dated August 9, 1994. <br />Forward to City Council. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted to recommend that Mark <br />Kleckner, Fox Development Co., proceed to request preliminary <br />plat approval of Fox Knoll. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission requested that men-tbers of the Park and <br />Recreation Commission present their most current Parks and Trail <br />Plan to the Planning Commission at either their regular meeting in <br />September or October. <br /> <br />The Planning and Economic Development Commissions tabled the <br />case entitled "Review Ahematives for Land Use and Transportation <br />Updates to Comprehensive Plan" until EDC has an opportunity to <br />review information from the City of Dayton and other data the <br />Planning Commission used in its decision m,'tking process. <br /> <br /> <br />