Laserfiche WebLink
REVIE~ <br /> <br /> CASE # -~ <br />PROPOSED POLICY ON EXCESS/DEFICIENT REVENUES <br /> By: Jeasie L. Hart, Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> r <br /> <br />During 1993 the City Council adopted Resolution g93-04-061 Establishing a Financial Policy for <br />the Purpose of iDesig,n,,ating the Working Capital Portion of the General Fund Balance <br />("unresm-ved-dcsignated fund balance). This policy was in response to the necessity to provide <br />for adequate levels of resources in each year until the fn'st property tax and state aid settlements <br />were received. <br /> <br />There have als0 been indications at the State level that cities with large "unreserved - <br />undesignated" fu~.~ d balances at year end will be penaI~zed in a manner similar to the way school <br />dismcts were pe~nalized a number of years ago. The unreserved-undesignated portion of the <br />General Fund lurid balance at December 31, 1992 was $496,970 or 29% of the total fund balance <br />and 23% of the ~dopted 1993 General Fund budget. While there should be some amount of <br />"cushion" or unre[served-undesignated fund balance for mid-year crises, such as cuts in state aids, <br />low property tax ~ollections or deficiencies in budgeted revenue, we should remain cognizant of <br />how much that .ufireserved-undesignated portion is. <br /> <br />There have been ~Several years when building permit and other revenues have far exceeded the <br />budgeted amounts and provided for an excess in actual revenues over expenditures. These <br />excesses, after ~omplying with the policy designating working capital, are adding to the <br />unreserved-undeSignated portion of the General Fund balance. While future years may still <br />provide for these .bxcesses, there may be years when there are deficiencies rather than excesses. <br /> <br />The City has taken great strides in the past few years toward responsible fiscal planning. An <br />additional step isito develop a policy for treating any excesses or deficiencies in actual year end <br />revenues and expenditures without jeopardizing the protection of e:cisting fund balances. <br /> <br />The City has dev~eloped and funded several revolving or replacement funds through the use of <br />"outside" resources such as the landfill These resources have ceased, as has the funding for some <br />of these funds. P~licies established for these funds generally allow only the use of earned interest <br />each year to keepl,the fund in tact and functional Although, as the City of Ramsey grows, so does <br />its n.eexis to pro,de increased levels of service. Funding is necessary to provide the increased <br />services. <br /> <br />A policy which alatomatically allocates a portion of excess revenues, if any, after complying with <br />the policies in pl ~a~ce for levels of fund balance, could be allocated to some of the revolving funds <br />such as the Equip~nent Replacement Fund, Permanent Improvement Revolv/ng Funds (established <br />to provide the Ciys share of street projects), or a capital building fund. The same should be mae <br />for any deficiencies. <br /> <br />There are sever~ other funds that could be considered in this policy. These three have been <br />chosen for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1) <br />2) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />The fundigg provided from these funds replaces the need to levy additional taxes. <br />All three ~fi.mds are "non-operating" type funds and provide funding toward more "capital" <br />or one tm~ expenditures. <br />These fun{ts would not be adversely affected by a reduction or elimination of this type of <br />funding s6urce. <br /> <br /> <br />