Laserfiche WebLink
necessitate eliminating the existing intersection and vacating Armstrong between Hwy. 10 <br />and CR 116. <br /> <br />Alternative #2 shows Armstrong as it is now, intersecting w/th Hwy. 10. This poses <br />traffic flow problems for traffic coming off the bridge road and heading east on Hwy. t 0. <br />The intersection and its traffic light stops traffic approximately 1/4 mite from the end of <br />the ramp. Traffic coming off.the bridge road as well as traffic already on eastbound Hwy. <br />10 would be mer~ng and stopping at the same point. Congestion on Hwy. 10 could <br />possib}y be made worse rather than alleviated. Since relieving congestion on the highway <br />is a primary goal of constructing a river bridge, the western bridge alignment need to be <br />considered carefully. <br /> <br />Another difficulty is that the western alignment means the bridge road travels over more <br />land and over two proposed roads--the highway frontage/business access road and the <br />residential collector. This would require two bridges. The eastern bridge alignment <br />requires only one overpass. Because this overpass would be close to the highway <br />overpass, there would be less need for grade changes of the bridge road. The western <br />bridge alignments, in contrast, would require either two overpasses in addition to the <br />highway overpass or would require that the entire bridge road be elevated for its entire <br />length--approximately 3/4 mile. The road from the eastern bridge alignment would be less <br />than 1/2 mile long from the river to the Hwy. 10 overpass. <br /> <br />EXTRATERRITORIAL ZONING <br /> <br />Regarding the traffic through the northern parts of the city, the Commission discussed the <br />possibility of planning for the area along Co. Rd. 83 (Armstrong Blvd. N'W) north of the <br />municipal boundary in Bums Township. Staff researched the options for such ptarming. <br /> <br />Minnesota statutes provide for extraterritorial municipal zoning and subdivision authority <br />under certain conditions. <br /> <br />A city. may by ordinance e.,aend the application of its zoning regnlations to <br />umncorporamd temtow located within two miles of its limits in any direction, but not in <br />a county, or town which has adopted zoning regulations; ... An), cfi .t3' may thereafter <br />enforce such regulations in the area to the same extent as ff such property were situated <br />within its corporate limits, until the counB' or town board adopts a comprehensive <br />zoning regulation which includes the area. <br /> MN Stat 462.357 subd. 1 <br /> <br />A municipally, may by ordinance extend the application of its subdivision regulations to <br />unincorporated temtorv located within nvo miles of its limits m any direction, but not in <br />a town wh.ich has adopted zoning regnlations; <br /> MN Stat 462.358 subd. la <br /> <br />(For these sections, a municipality is defined as any city or town. MN Stat 462.352 subd. <br />2) <br /> <br /> <br />