06/09/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

t businesses along the highway. North of the business areas is designated Industrial as far as the landfill area.[ Much of the landfill area is designated Open Space. The northern part of the landfill area {s designated Park, Like the No fBridge scenario, land along the river is designated Single Family Residential. Areas along~e south side of Hwy. 10 are proposed for more intense uses. The area fi.om Ramsey Blv~t. to Sunfish Lake Blvd. provides for High or Medium Density Residential. Likewise, th~ area on the kighway west of Armstrong Blvd. is designated High Density Residential. IBetween Rarnsey and Armstrong is the Commercial area that provides the new residential arid commercial areas with retail services. A fi.ontage/access road runs along the south side o~Hwy. 10, providing access to these areas. This eliminates the need for direct access on anti offthe h/ghway and reduces highway congestion. Figure 7: Western Bridge Alignment, Alternative #2 Like Alternative #1, the Mississippi River bridge would be constructed directly south of Puma St. However., the bridge road would terminate at CR ] 16, the east-west collector. Tra~c from the bridge would be directed onto Hwy. 10, via a diamond interchange, or pass over the highway for iccess to the residential, commercial, and industrial uses along CR l 16, which acts as the divide?~ between residential and non-residential land uses. The north side is designated Medium and.~Iigh Density Residential. Single Family Resident/al stretches north of these Land uses east of Armstrong Blvd. and north of Hwy. 10 differ somewhat from Alternative/~ t. The business park area at Ramsey Blvd., becomes a Community Commercial r;area. West of Armstrong, the extension of CR 116 to Puma St. necessitates different lancl uses near the connection with the bridge road. It is not an appropriate area for single far~ily residential uses. Office uses are proposed to take advantage of the high visibility of t~he area from the bridge road. Armstrong Blvd. is shown connecting with Hwy. 10, as it does presently. South of Hw~y. 10, land uses that differ from Alternative #1 are shown. Community ? . Commercial Iretail) ~s shown along the highway as well as residential areas. Office Showroom Wes are shown west of the bridge road, again to take advantage of the higfla visibility oftl~e location and location at the interchange of two major traffic routes. The access road fiere is moved away from the kighway. This allows for a larger area for larger commercial ~evelopments. This road and the residential collector are shown passing under the bri'_elge road. Single Family Residential is shown for the remainder of the area south of Hwy. 10. The two western bridge alternatives pose difficulties along Hwy. 10. Alternative #1 shows the brildge road becoming CR 116. Because of the close proximity of Hwy. 10 and CR 116, Armstrong Blvd. ends at CR 116 and does not meet HWY. 10. This would