08/04/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Also repe4ting Figure 6, north of the CR 116 areas, Single Family Residential designation begins at tt~e golf course and continues east along the north side of 149th Ave. NE to the landfill site! Between 149th and CR 116, a combination of Medium and High Density Residentiallis proposed. The landfill area is designated Open Space. A Park would be developed between this Open Space area and 153rd Ave. NW. On the south of the Open Space area!is designated Industrial. South of Hwy. 10, land uses are identical to Figure 6 from Mississippi West Park and to the east, v4jth an area east of Ramsey Blvd. providing for High Density Residential. However, some land jases that differ from Figure 6 are shown. Next to the park, Medium Density Residential replaces Commercial (retail) which in turn replaces some Single Family Residentiall land along the highway. Business Warehouse uses are shown west of the bridge road, again to take advantage of the high visibility of the location at the interchange of two major traffic routes. The south access roa~ here is moved away fi.om the highway. This allows for a larger area for larger commerci4 developments. This road and the residential collector are shown passing under the ~ridge road. Single Family Residential is shown for the remainder of the area south of Hwy. 10. Attached tq this report is a chart comparing the scenarios shown in Figures 4 - 7 with the existing sitt~ation (Attachment A). The charts serve two purposes. One, the quantity of land in eacl~ of the different land use categories is listed. Two, the acreages in each alternative l:an be compared to the existing zoning scheme and to other alternatives. It should be doted that the comparison covers only the Hwy. 10 study area. A similar analysis th~ includes the entire city is recommended as.part of the comprehensive plan amendment, work. Figure 7A This altern~ive, a variation of Figure 7, evolved fi.om discussion between staff and the consultants.[ In general, alternative 7A utilizes a roadway system similar to the one approved by the Planning Commission and shown in Figure 7. There are two main differences ~etween this figure and the others. First, the land uses are separated into only two types: residential and nonresidential. Second, it covers the entire city rather than individual segments, l~ore focused attention has been devoted to the alignment of specific roads and the amount ofr~idential and nonresidential land. For simplicity, only the Hwy. 10 corridor land uses are ideritified in this report. 9