Laserfiche WebLink
Ramsey Land Use/Transportation Corridor <br /> 4/18/94 page 2 <br /> <br />Amendment. These planning activities basically designated urban and rural <br />service areas, and resulted in zoning and subdivision regulations for controlling <br />new residential and commercial development. <br /> <br />Throughout the 1980's, the City of Ramsey continued to experience above- <br />average residential growth. Until 1985, much of this residential development <br />occurred throughout the City as large-lot residential developments without the <br />benefit of municipal sanitary sewer and water services. In 1985, the <br />southeastern part of the City received central sanitar5, sewer. <br /> <br />In 1980, the City prepared its comprehensive plan in response to the <br />Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976. Since, 1980, the City has prepared <br />several amendments to its original plan. The purpose of these plan <br />amendments has been for the most part to amend its urban service area in <br />response to continued residential development pressure. In addition, however, <br />the City developed four distinct development areas as part of its I990 plan <br />amendment. <br /> <br />The consulting team also met with adjacent cities to evaluate the existence of <br />shared land use and transportation issues. In summary, these issues include: <br /> <br />The planned land uses and site design criteria for the Anoka Enterprise <br />Park and the possible e~ension of McKinley Street. <br /> <br />The potential for future commercial land~'uses at the intersection of'TH <br />116 and TH 47. <br /> <br />The potential Dayton and Ramsey Mississippi River bridge crossing. <br /> <br />The City of Elk River land use and public facility planning activities that <br />the City of Ramsey may wish to monitor. <br /> <br />USE AND TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />The following are descriptions of possible land uses and transportation corridors identified by <br />the working ~oup. In some cases several alternatives'were evaluated by the working ~oup <br />and the enclosed are the "preferred" alternative(s). The following text corresponds with a <br />figure attached to this memorandum. <br /> <br /> <br />