03/17/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

That the Subject Property is not visible from the Mississippi River and the Applicant has proposed a drainage plan that provides for a detention volume consisting of a trench lined with block that will limit the surface water discharged from the Subject Property into the existing storm water system to 1.7 cfs. 10. That in 1986, the City of Ramsey granted a variance to the impervious surface area requirement for Lot 2, Block 3, Riverside West to be developed with self-service storage facilities at an impervious surface area coverage of 85%. 11. That the Applicants request for a variance to the impervious surface area has been forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources, the Environmental Quality Board, and the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. 12. That there are unique circumstances applying to the subject property that do not generally apply to other properties in the district. Namely: a) the subject property is in the Critical Overlay Diswict and lot development is restricted to 30% of the lot area; b) Lots 1 and 2 were allowed to be developed beyond the 30% impervious surface area limit and with no side yard setbacks; c) the development of the subject property is an expansion of the development that has occurred on Lots 1 and 2. 13. That the special conditions causing the undue hardship do/do not result fi.om the actions of the Applicant. 14. That such variance is/is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the B-3 Highway Business District. That if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied to other owners of lands, structures or buildings in the same district. t6. 17. That if granted, the variance will/will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Ramsey Zoning Chapter or other property, in the B-3 Highway Business Dismct. That if granted, the variance will/wiI1 not substanti~ly increase the congestion of public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair property values within the neighborhood. 18. 19. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: , whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey Board of Adjustment this the __ day of ., 1994. ATI'EST: Chairperson City Administrator 26,