Laserfiche WebLink
9. That the Applicants have stated that the reason for the excess size on the proposed building is <br /> to allow for the storage of vehicles, a boat, and other personal equipment. <br /> <br />10. That the Applicants have stated that the detached accessory building will be utilized for <br /> personal storage and will not be used to facilitate a business. <br /> <br />11. That the construction of the detached accessory building will comply with all applicable <br /> Building Codes. <br /> <br />12. That the proposed building would meet all setback requirements for the R-I, Rural <br /> Developing zoning district. <br /> <br />13. That the exterior finish is required to be of the same general design and materials as the <br /> home. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br /> residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br /> value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />17. That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br /> uses. <br /> <br />18. That the proposed use will be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br /> highways and streets. <br /> <br />19. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />20. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any <br />persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, <br />smoke fumes, glare or odors. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Kurak, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> Mayor Gamec <br /> Councilmember Cook <br /> Councilmember Kurak <br /> Councilmember Elvig <br /> Councilmember Pearson <br /> Councilmember Strommen <br /> Councilmember Zimmerman <br /> RESOLUTION//03-05-109 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />