Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2.2. <br />Meeting Date: 01/24/2012 <br />By: Brian Olson, Engineering/Public Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Implementation of Long Term Road Maintenance policy <br />Background: <br />The concept of developing an assessment policy for street reconstruction has been talked about numerous times <br />over the past couple of years. The discussions really escalated with the advancement of the Andrie Street /164th <br />Lane improvement project in 2009 and have progressed a long ways but the situation still remains unsettled. <br />Early on, in 2009, discussions revolved around the existing City street assessment policy which currently pertains <br />specifically to the Street Maintenance Program (SMP); where overlays are assessed at a rate of 50% and sealcoats <br />are being phased out through the year 2014, from a previous rate of 50% to the current rate of 15% in 2012. <br />Because there is not any money to fund the change in policy, discussions revolved around the revenue source, <br />standards for reconstruction, specifications and generally about what should be included when a roadway is <br />reconstructed. <br />In November of 2009, staff was directed to review what it would cost to continue with our standard street <br />maintenance activities, and add reconstruction costs into the program in five year increments. Staff completed this <br />analysis and then evaluated how much funding would be needed over the next ten years based upon a concept that <br />when a street turns 40 years old we reconstruct. Since approximately 45% of the roadways in the City were <br />constructed between 1975 and 1985 (a 40 year design life was assumed), it amounted to approximately $90 million <br />to accomplish this program. Although we know that there is no way that there could be a program such as this <br />afforded, it demonstrated the dire consequences and the drastic need for the improvement. This $90 million dollar <br />figure was used in all of the publications within the most recent communication plan and FAQ. <br />On June 15, 2010 this information was provided to the City Council. See attached information on the 5 year <br />breakdown and a history of road construction in the City. <br />At the September 21, 2010 Council work session discussions focused on a franchise fee and public participation <br />campaign to educate the residents of the imminent need for roadway improvements, and solicit their feedback on <br />the potential scenarios that exist for a long term sustainable funding source. Staff discussed this matter with Himle <br />Homer, a consultant working on marketing for the COR, and requested a proposal to assist the City in completing a <br />public participation program. <br />On January 18, 2011 the information in the proposal was presented, and following discussion it was the consensus <br />of the Council to accept the proposal and execute a contract with Himle Homer in an amount not to exceed $43,000 <br />for advancement of this long term road maintenance initiative. <br />In order to formulate the questions on the 30 question survey, one of the first items included in the accepted <br />proposal was to research other communities and find out what they have done and engage those communities <br />to learn strategies on how to successfully implement programs of this nature. On April 19, 2011, the results of this <br />research was presented to the City Council at a work session and Staff was given consensus to make changes to the <br />30 question survey to residents. <br />On May 17, 2011, the City Council gave Staff and Himle Homer approval of the script that was to be the 30 <br />questions survey. and approval to go ahead with the survey. <br />In June of 2011, the 300 resident survey that was conducted by Himle Rapp, formerly known as Himle Homer. <br />