Laserfiche WebLink
This survey first gathered information from the resident about the satisfaction that they have had with their overall <br />quality of life within the City of Ramsey. An overwhelming 93% of the residents rated their quality of life in <br />Ramsey as good or excellent. They also felt that the two largest issues facing the City over the upcoming years were <br />the COR and maintaining an aging roadway system. <br />Additionally, the resident survey asked the residents to choose between 3 financing scenarios: <br />Option 1: Raise the general fund levy to accommodate the need <br />Option 2: Assess 100 % of the costs to the benefiting property owners <br />Option 3: Implement a new revenue source (franchise fee) <br />In July of 2011, the City Council received the attached presentation by Himle Rapp and were given an <br />opportunity to express their desires and or concerns about preparing a communication plan. Of the three funding <br />scenarios, the one that got the most support was the implementation of the franchise fee for road reconstruction. <br />During August and September, Staff worked with the consultant to prepare a draft communication plan, FAQ, fact <br />sheet, a draft website, an online survey form, etc. <br />On October 18, 2011, the City was given the attached Communication plan as well as distribution materials and the <br />website was unveiled in Draft form. The following comments were provided: <br />•The Garnet Street project was shown as a project that we would provide an alternative funding source for so that <br />we could move forward with surveying, design etc and therefore move forward next summer to show signs of a <br />successful integration of the program. At the Public Works Committee in December, this item was removed due to <br />lack of interest from the abutting residents at a subsequent meeting until a decision is made about the long term <br />road maintenance initiative even though we told the residents that we would write in the feasibility study that we <br />would match whatever funding scenario resulted from the decision. <br />•Council commented on the online survey. After much deliberation, it was the Council direction to allow for an <br />online survey as long as the name and address fields were required for the comments to be registered. <br />•All meetings that will be held regarding this program will be done at the Ramsey Municipal Center and not in the <br />neighborhoods" at a neutral site per City Council direction. <br />•The meeting format will be similar to the Ramsey 3 process. A brief presentation and break into smaller groups to <br />discuss agenda items that are generated by the group. (Open Space technology) <br />•The City Council wanted more interaction and graphical representation of the issue in the website. This is a <br />funding issue but do not lose sight of the issue. Use the year of original construction map and generate a FAQ that <br />is dynamic and updated frequently. <br />•The City Council direction was to provide a video on QCTV with the Mayor, Public Works Chair, Public Works <br />Director and City Administrator. Included in this case is a FAQ that will be the primary dialog in preparation of this <br />video. <br />On November 15, 2011, Chuck Tombarge from Himle Rapp was present and Staff specifically requested direction <br />on the attached communication plan, attached fact sheet, public engagement survey, power point presentation, an <br />FAQ prepared by Himle Homer relative the long term road maintenance program. <br />The direction at this meeting was to: <br />Tighten up the numbers so they are more realistic, make revisions to the communications plan by taking out the <br />language about the costs being equivalent to a cup of coffee a day, and consider a franchise fee of $14 per month <br />per household to create a source to fully fund the issue without assessments. <br />Notification: <br />N/A <br />Observations: <br />