My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:05:08 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 5:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/24/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$1,513,215 attributed to the total Municipal Center debt. She talked briefly about the one time <br />funding transfer from the fund balance in 2010. Ms. Lund continued that the City Council has <br />mentioned they would like to keep the levy constant. With TIF, it brings it down to about <br />$32,000. She presented some examples of the effect of the levy on taxpayers - on varying priced <br />homes, and noted that it also depended upon the school district they are in. Ms Lund explained <br />that for 2013, the City will need additional one -time funding of $417,807 to cover the $603,000 <br />internal borrowing or one -time transfer from an undesignated fund — such as the Landfill Trust <br />Fund. For 2014, TIF 2 and TIF 10 are decertified, which will add back approximately $605,000 <br />to City taxes. The Street Maintenance Program was mentioned as well. Ms. Lund disseminated <br />a handout of a graph showing the one -time transfers as well as the funds balance analysis. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would like to hear how we are going to fix this in the future. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that if you look at two years out, there's an issue of about <br />$600,000. Two years out, these funds will disappear. The PIR Fund is replenished but the <br />budget is so tight. He noted we have to find a way to reduce costs. The City Council needs to be <br />made aware of the balances of these funds, etc. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated that even if you subtract out the road reconstruction, we still have a hole. <br />Ms. Lund reiterated that TIF 2 and 10 will generate about $605,000. We have to levy about a <br />million and a half for debt service on this building. She added that 2013 is a gap year. <br />Mr. Ulrich added so one gap year — one time money would be something we could do. <br />Finance Officer Lund noted that the majority of the general fund is attributable to street <br />maintenance <br />Councilmember Strommen stated this is good information for Council to have and we need to <br />discuss this very seriously. She stated that last week the rest of the Council learned that Mayor <br />Ramsey had some recommendations for change but she feels she and the rest are disadvantaged <br />as to what to do because they do not have all the information relating to this recommendation. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated that with regard to his recommendations, we have not talked about that yet <br />— so we should not be worrying about that It will not happen this year. <br />Mr. Ulrich stated that this was not specifically asked for by the Mayor. It's never a good policy <br />to take one -time fixes. We wanted to show you what could be done plus a long -term plan. <br />Director of Public Works Olson reported that from engineering, it's a pretty conservative <br />estimate on the revenue provided. In 2010, there was a 93% increase with fees associated with <br />work that was done. In 2011 — 126% - with conservative projects in the CIP - we are at about <br />96% for next year. <br />City Council Work Session / November 1, 2011 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.