My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 01/24/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:05:08 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 5:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/24/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Ramsey stated that with regard to the budget for next year — the concern was previously <br />we did not want to levy any more money than what was levied last year. The trouble we will run <br />into with the new way things are calculated, it will look like we raised taxes. <br />Finance Officer Lund responded that the direction was to keep taxes the same. With two school <br />districts, it will be a little more difficult. If the direction is that Council would like to see the <br />levy kept the same — the reduction is $32,000. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated we need to be at least there. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she agrees with that goal but we also should have that entered <br />as part of the conversation. The dollars we invest in the streets and neighborhoods — that' s a <br />value to residents too. $50 to $100 is worth it. There are two sides to this — one is to keep the <br />levy the same and the other is we need to invest in our City. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated that we need to keep the streets up but we do not want to have foreclosures <br />either. Will $50 to $100 cause foreclosures — he thought it could. <br />Councilmember Strommen reiterated it' s about investment into our community. <br />Councilmember Tossey expressed concern about declining home values and added he does not <br />want to raise the levy. <br />Councilmember Elvig commented that we are trying to add in The Draw for example — but then <br />we are trying to cut other things We will have several million dollars coming on with street <br />reconstruction — there will be a lot of complexities in the next couple of years. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated that in the good years, we built up fund balances for one time <br />money for bad times. Everything we build costs money. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would be interested in losing that $30,000 and keeping it the same. <br />Councilmember Strommen asked what we are giving up to lower it that $30,000 — and is it worth <br />it. When is what we are giving up not worth it. She views it as a range. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he wants to be able to say he did not raise taxes. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated he is confident we can come back with a budget to reduce that <br />$30,000, without significant impacts. We will work on that and bring it back to the City Council <br />and have the levy slightly lower than last years. <br />Ms. Lund reported in 2008 it was $10 million, in 09 it was $9,978 million, in 2010 it was $9,639 <br />million, in 2011 it was $9,449 million and in 2012 the proposed amount is $9,689 million and <br />having TIF 1 come back to help absorb that. We have been decreasing for the last five years. <br />City Council Work Session / November 1, 2011 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.