My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:10:27 AM
Creation date
1/27/2012 9:16:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
design guidelines, such as engineers and <br />architects. We purposely held the meeting <br />before putting any guidelines together. Our <br />consultant made a general presentation <br />with questions for the audience about de- <br />sign concepts that might be acceptable for <br />Salem. We found that improving the charac- <br />ter of the Route 28 strip was a shared goal <br />of most of the participants, but there were <br />concerns about adding costs to comply with <br />new design guidelines and overregulating <br />signs in particular. <br />Armed with feedback from this meet- <br />ing, our consultant prepared a document <br />using many photographs of local sites and <br />lines were adopted by the planning board <br />in March 2011 as part of the town's site plan <br />review regulations. The guidelines apply to <br />new development as well as expansions or <br />redevelopment of existing buildings and <br />sites. They are applied to each development <br />that requires site plan approval from the <br />planning board, but can be waived if the <br />board finds they are not applicable due to <br />project size. <br />One critical decision was to adopt the <br />guidelines as voluntary recommendations, <br />not mandatory regulations. The planning <br />board felt that the level of detail in the guide- <br />lines would take some time for everyone to <br />buildings. We posted everything on the <br />town website and, after several revisions <br />and review by the planning board and my- <br />self, a final document was produced. <br />This document, Design Guidelines for <br />Salem, New Hampshire, includes chapters <br />on site planning, architecture, landscap- <br />ing, lighting, and signage. It covers all new <br />commercial (retail, office, and industrial) <br />and multifamily residential development <br />projects. Each chapter contains goals, <br />objectives, and guidelines, which take the <br />form of brief sentences with accompanying <br />photographs. There are about 25o separate <br />guidelines in 90 pages. The design guide- <br />® These before- and -after photos demonstrate the power of aesthetic improvements <br />to change a retail strip. <br />get used to, and they wanted to gauge the <br />community's experience with them for a few <br />years before making them mandatory. <br />LESSONS <br />Adopting design guidelines in a pro- develop- <br />ment community with an existing commercial <br />corridor is no easy task. In Salem, it helped to <br />invite the development community to partici- <br />pate in the process at an early stage, not just <br />to comment on a finished document. Keeping <br />the public informed by posting draft versions <br />of the guidelines on the town website and <br />televising all discussions on them created <br />a climate of openness. We were fortunate <br />to hire an experienced consultant who was <br />able to smoothly deal with concerns after <br />having done so many times before in other <br />communities. We were able to overcome any <br />remaining objections by adopting the guide- <br />lines as voluntary. I also prepared a checklist <br />to summarize the 90 -page document in just a <br />few pages, which made it easier to convey to <br />property owners. <br />Several new projects have been reviewed <br />under the design guidelines so far, and the <br />experience has been positive. The planning <br />board requested architectural upgrades and <br />increased size of plantings in accordance with <br />the guidelines. I expect that, as they are used <br />more often, both the development community <br />and the planning board will find the photo- <br />graphs in the guidelines to be beneficial and <br />easy to use. Ultimately, I have no doubt this <br />tool will help us better control the appearance <br />of new development in Salem. <br />0 Newer projects demonstrate what <br />the town was trying to accomplish <br />with design guidelines, including <br />more attractive buildings and <br />improved signage and landscaping. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 11.11 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION ipage 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.