My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2011
>
Agenda - Council - 12/13/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:22:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2012 3:53:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/13/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Topsoil requirements - no more salvage of on site material; all topsoil will be imported and meet MnDOT <br />topsoil borrow requirements. <br />• If the area of restoration is within a rural ditch section reserved for stormwater management, salvaged topsoil <br />can be used to promote infiltration. <br />• 4" uniform depth of installation. <br />• Turf requirements - sod will be used exclusively <br />• Do we want to consider seeding in ditch and/or ponding easement areas, to include low maintenance native <br />seed conducive for sandy soils? <br />• Require the contractor to water for 30 days and establish root growth, at which point it becomes the <br />obligation of the property owner. Resident notification letters to be delivered as the project is nearing <br />completion to remind them of their responsibility for long term maintenance. <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council adopt a Turf Establishment Policy, as presented, requiring the import <br />of 4 inches of premium top soil, sod, and 3 0-days of watering. <br />Public Works Committee consensus was reached to schedule discussion of the depth of top soil requirement for a <br />future Public Works Committee meeting. <br />Case 5.4: Discuss Turf Restoration Concerns on City Improvement Project #08-34; the Bituminous Paving of 151 st <br />& 152nd Avenues, and Fluorine Street <br />Staff reviewed the report and noted this project involved resident complaints about the amount of rock in the <br />topsoil. <br />Staff wanted to clarify to the Committee that the City supplied the dirt, which was screened, so the last 2 inches of <br />dirt was the same for all. The City subcut down 2 inches to get out rock but some residents may have done more <br />watering. <br />Public Works Committee consensus was reached to direct staff to write a letter to the residents in the project area <br />indicating the project would be inspected in the spring to determine whether additional corrective actions are <br />necessary and, at a minimum, the rocks will be removed. After that, the property owners are expected to take over <br />responsibility. <br />Case 5.5: Approve Final Draft of RFP and Contract for Contracted Sweeping Services <br />Street Supervisor Riemer reviewed in the staff report at the October Public Works Committee meeting approval was <br />given to contract out spring street sweeping. Staff has prepared a contract for the Committee's review. <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Response for Proposal for 2012 spring sweeping subject to <br />legal review. <br />Case 5.6: Discuss Potential Reconstruction of Garnet Street, North of 167th Avenue <br />Staff reviewed in the report that street maintenance activities on Garnet St, between 167th Avenue and Brookfield <br />subdivision have not occurred on the City's standard maintenance plan. Staff has observed while going through the <br />long term street maintenance and reconstruction initiative, that the Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund <br />could be utilized as seed money for this program and asked whether Garnet Street, between 167th Avenue and the <br />Brookfield subdivision, should be used as a kick-off project using the Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund <br />as seed money. <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve a Garnet Street roadway project of the same width as streets to <br />the north including concrete curb and gutter, full utilities, and a sidewalk on the east side. The funding would be a <br />50/50 cost split with the residents for the roadway improvements only, and subgrade corrections would be included <br />with the utility work and paid for through the appropriate City enterprise funds (to be reimbursed in the future <br />if/when the properties connect). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.