Laserfiche WebLink
outside storage was significant enough to bring it to their <br />attention. Because it abuts a residential zone, he felt the <br />Commission may want to include a condition prohibiting exterior <br />storage. Commissioner Deemer was willing to allow exterior storage <br />with screening because It Is allowed on adjacent property. <br /> <br />Mr. Rychner stated he will need an outside area to cool ingots, but <br />he felt that area could be under some enclosure. He asked for <br />limited storage In the area bhlnd the building which would be out <br />of view from the publlc. He would also completely screen it. He <br />polnted out the proposed storage area on the site plan. <br /> <br />Commissioners LaDue and Thorud yielded to the Attorney's position <br />that exterior storage Is not permitted. Chairman Zimmerman and <br />Commissioner LaDue thought it would be acceptable to have storage <br />in the back corner of the building if it had a roof over it or some <br />sort of enclosure, and It Is screened. <br /> <br />Mr. Rychner stated he has a structure available that he could put <br />in there that would be enclosed and would have a roof. <br />Commissioner LaDue said that would be acceptable to him. <br />Commissioner Hendriksen didn't want to see storage dumped in the <br />back. If there is some effort to organize it in an orderly fashion <br />or put it under a carport, he would be agreeable. Mr. Rychner <br />agreed to that stipulation. Commissioner Deemer noted the adjacent <br />property has storage in semi-tractors.- <br /> <br />Chairman Zlmmerman then summerized that the majority of the <br />Commlssion feels outside storage is appropriate. <br /> <br />In reviewing Items 1-9 of the Findings of Fact, Mr. Otto noted the <br />legal description in Item S Is subject to change depending on the <br />outcome of the descrlption on the purchase agreement. Also, Item ? <br />is a new Item. Commissioner Deemer questioned the accuracy of Item <br />7, again pointing out there is a highway between the lot line of <br />this lot and the residential area; therefore, it was his opinion <br />that the lot technically does not abut a residential area. <br /> <br />There were no changes to Items 1-9. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto reviewed some of the changes on Items 10-21. <br />Commission discussed Item 14. <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />MOTION by Zimmerman, Seconded by Deemer, that the item simply <br />state "That the current business has operated for eleven years on <br />undeveloped land in the Clty of Anoka. FURTHER DISCUSSION: <br />Chairman Zimmerman felt the wording now in the document implies Mr. <br />Rychner was doing something wrong, when it is not known what the <br />requirements are in the City of Anoka. Commissioner Hendriksen <br />argued the facts are as stated and should not be altered, <br />disagreeing that there is any inference that a permit was needed. <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/December 6, 1990 <br /> Page 4 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />