Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION by Hendriksen, Seconded by Thorud, Item 46, change the <br />words "will/will not" to "may be". DISCUSSION: Chairman Zimmerman <br />thought the Attorney has stated the wording "may be" is not <br />appropriate wording in Findings of Fact. Commissioner Hendriksen <br />stated he was not In a position of knowing whether this will or <br />will not be unduly dangerous. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Hendriksen, Thorud; NO-Deemer, LaDue, <br />Zlmmerman; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion failed. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 46, "will not". <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zirnmerman; NO-Hendriksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />~MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 47, "will". <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Hendriksen noted Item 23 of the Findings <br />of Fact states the Applicant's site plan indicates the drives, <br />storage...are proposed to be grave] rather than hard surfaced in <br />Area B which does not conform to City code. He didn't see any <br />significant improvement on the property, and he believed the <br />Comprehensive Plan is to better the area and to expect the <br />ordinances to be followed. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zimmerman; NO-Hendriksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 48, "will" in the first <br />instance and "will not" In the second instance. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zimmerman; NO-Hendriksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 49, "will not" <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Thorud didnZt think they could determine <br />what the future neighboring houses are going to De, asking how he <br />wou]d know whether it will be disturbing to them or not. <br />Commissioner Hendrlksen felt they have heard enough from existing <br />neighbors that the site is disturbing, and that can be projected to <br />to mean that any new neighbors would also find it disturbing. <br />Commissioner Deemer did not fecal! any objections from the <br />testimony at the public hearing. It all had to do with the waste <br />management facility, which has been deleted from this permit. <br />Commissioner Thorud disagreed. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zimmerman; NO-Hendriksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Hendriksen, Seconded by Thorud, Item 50, that there <br />will not be a substantial improvement. DISCUSSION: <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/December 6, 1990 <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />