Laserfiche WebLink
equal about 455 households added per year, which is a lot. The ultimate growth will be after <br />2030 sometime. He presented historical information on the new home permit trends since 1990 <br />— a lot of peaks and valleys. In.2003, there were over 400 new home permits — in 2004 there <br />were over 500 new home permits. In looking at the growth trend, the average would be 212 <br />households added per year since 1990 — this is an historical number - not a "magic" number — it <br />can be used to illustrate forecasts. Senior Planner Gladhill reported there is a potential for at <br />least 388 new households for 2012 with the Residence at The COR, Suite Living and Stoney <br />River. <br />Acting Mayor Wise commented that most units would not be occupied right away. <br />Councilmember Elvig arrived (6:29 p.m.). <br />City Engineer Himmer pointed out that we did the fees based on SAC and WACs — not based on <br />units. He talked about how the fees were calculated — 400 units of multi - family equal 200 single <br />family units. <br />Councilmember Backous stated the average number of households is 212 — and inquired what <br />assumption should be used. <br />Mr. Gladhill noted we are looking at a more conservative approach with the 2040 plan. <br />Director of Public Works Olson asked Council if they want staff to keep the assumptions the <br />same as we originally had — the same as the most recent updated plan or be more conservative. <br />We will have a lot more conversations to talk about cost, etc. — how do you spread that cost out - <br />to more users or people that are buying into the system or do you make a conscious decision to <br />add more users. He did not know if the system design would be much different. Our system is <br />designed for ultimate growth and we will talk more about that later. The decision staff is looking <br />for from Council tonight is do you want us to be more conservative. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that the growth forecast was not realistic. He talked about a more <br />comprehensive forecast/study being done and that maybe it's a good idea to hold off on <br />assumptions for six months or so until that study is complete. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated he sees a lot of projections that did not come true — now we <br />have the reality. Ramsey is a very complex place. He stated his ward has a lot of septic systems <br />and people in his area like it that way. When we put pipes in the ground, we have to pay for <br />them. We have a Charter that states people do not have to hook up and we cannot force anyone <br />to do so. He stated he is not saying that the Charter should be changed but the fact is that we <br />cannot make anyone hook up. He added that he would not want to do that anyway. With regard <br />to the Land Use Map — he was a part of that process. Only a small number of people came to <br />give input — basically the landowners who wanted to develop. We should be looking at our <br />sewer system the same way a franchise determines where they will build. They put a dot on the <br />map and work around a certain area. Councilmember McGlone stated he favors the greatest of <br />conservatism we can come up with. <br />City Council - Special Meeting — February 6, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />