My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/06/2012 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2012
>
Minutes - Council - 02/06/2012 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:18:02 PM
Creation date
3/20/2012 2:51:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
02/06/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Elvig stated that one of the things he is concerned with is the talk about the <br />water that's available. Maybe the restricted growth in Ramsey might be the supply of water <br />rather than the septic system. They may figure out this is a regional problem, but if not, Ramsey <br />will be very restricted. If we are going to support growth in Ramsey, it should be more focused <br />on water rather than sewer. <br />Director of Public Works Olson stated we did think about that when we did the 2004 Comp Plan <br />amendment — a much more cost - effective solution to expand this ground water system — but we <br />do not want to get into the cost of this system yet. We want to know what Council's idea is with <br />regard to the ultimate service area — we want to capitalize on infrastructure. We will get into the <br />cost discussions later. <br />City Engineer Himmer stated that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows 450 units per year to <br />meet projections. In 2004, the Utility Comp Plan projected 360 units per year through the year <br />2020. Historically it shows that since 1990, there have been 220 units per year. It goes back to <br />the number of people paying into the system and the tax base. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated he wants to know what's in the ground (pipe) and what the <br />usage is. <br />Mr. Olson stated we are talking theory right now — we cannot talk cost until we know the <br />ultimate area. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated we have to factor in where we are today to which Mr. Olson <br />assured him staff would. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated we have a Comp Plan showing the ultimate service area. She <br />did not get changing that — but what's clear is growth and population — we should be focusing <br />our adjustments on how fast our growth is. She stated they should pick a reasonable number on <br />that and then stick with the service area. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated we are defining the supply and we will build infrastructure. The <br />projecting population is the building demand. If you do not get the growth, you will not build <br />the system. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated we do not have to change this. It's just that the rate at which <br />we will get there is much slower. <br />Councilmember Elvig talked about developers paying for the infrastructure. <br />Mr. Ulrich stated that the fees that are paid now should be used for the existing system. <br />Mr. Himmer stated that discussions have been how we get rates low to encourage development. <br />Deputy City Administrator Nelson stated that we looked at where we were in comparison with <br />other cities' development costs. Some of our development costs are higher but our rates are <br />City Council — Special Meeting - February 6, 2012 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.