My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/08/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 05/08/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:16:03 PM
Creation date
5/7/2012 12:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/08/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 7.2. <br />Meeting Date: 05/08/2012 <br />By: Jo Thieling, Administrative Services <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Approval of Special Events Permit for The Penalty Box Bar & Grill, 14077 St. Francis Boulevard NW <br />Background: <br />SPM Properties, dba The Penalty Box Bar & Grill, located at 14077 St. Francis Boulevard NW, has requested a <br />special events permit to host a tent party on June 22 and 23, 2012, including a live band both nights from 8:00 p.m. <br />to midnight. Staff brought discussion of this request to a work session on Tuesday, April 24. Council discussed <br />the following with the applicant: location of the tent to assure safety of attendees, garbage pick-up, <br />patrolling parking spaces for other businesses located within the strip mall, the number of officers needed for <br />security, allowing the band to play until midnight, requiring a $2,000 escrow, requiring signatures of other <br />businesses in the mall, past -due utility bills, number of complaints from past events, the possible cancellation of <br />monitoring service for the alarm system due to non-payment, and the time line for removing the tent. <br />Following is a summary of the discussion. Council supported relocation of the tent closer to the building, but to <br />allow it to remain in the front versus the back as staff had suggested. There was support for creating the flow of <br />traffic around the edge of the building. Mr. McManus stated that the utility bills are the responsibility of the <br />landlord. It was noted that the number of complaints received from past events were relatively few in number in <br />comparison to the number of residents within the City and the number of event attendees. Similar requests for <br />allowing a band to play until midnight have been granted; however, the amplifiers have been turned down at 11:00 <br />p.m. Due to past experience, it was noted two licensed officers should be sufficient for security along with the <br />added security, also hired by Mr. McManus. With regard to the possibility of no alarm monitoring service after <br />April 30, 2012, due to non payment for services, Mr. McManus assured the Council this would be taken care of. <br />With regard to tent removal, Mr. McManus assured the Council the tent would be removed by Monday morning. <br />There was a differing of opinions on the Council with regard to whether or not the applicant should be required to <br />have each tenant in the mall sign a letter stating they approve of the event. The majority felt that all tenants do not <br />need to sign, however, Mayor Ramsey encouraged Council to visit with the other tenants prior to the event. City <br />Administrator Ulrich recommended a letter from the building owner be required and Police Chief Way <br />recommended requiring the applicant to have an employee cover the parking lot, as has been required during past <br />events. <br />Consensus of the Council was to allow the tent to be erected in front of the building and require the applicant to <br />provide disclosure notice of the event, signed by the building owner, indicating that he is in favor of the event taking <br />place, prior to granting a permit. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />Different options for the tent location were discussed at length at the work session. Staff has created an aerial view <br />of the property showing three different options - one behind the building which the applicant is opposed to; one in <br />front of and close to the building which appeared agreed upon by Council, staff and the applicant; and one to the <br />side of the building which shows a 60 x 100 foot tent will not fit without having a portion of the tent encroach onto <br />the street. Attached to this case is the aerial view of the property showing the three locations. <br />It is expected the applicant will have the letter of support from the property owner prior to the Council meeting as <br />was discussed at the work session. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.