My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/21/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2012
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/21/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:19:47 AM
Creation date
5/11/2012 4:13:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/21/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 19th, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />to the large amounts of rain which we had received and the ground being saturated it took several <br />days for the water to recede. <br />This pond is designed to a 100 year storm capacity and likely would have overflowed and <br />exceeded its banks without any blockage in the ponds outlet pipe. The maximum designed <br />elevation of the pond is 874 ft., and those elevations exist well outside of the pond's normal banks. <br />These areas are intended for water storage during extreme rain events. <br />I feel it is reasonable to reimburse the golf course for the expense of clearing the blockage <br />as the city was not equipped to do so. We will consider the cost of unblocking the storm sewer as <br />well as the rental of pumps used to expedite the removal of the water. The $1,600.00 invoice for <br />Drain King to remove the blockage and the $1,395.00 of pump rental invoices are considered <br />reasonable as these are costs that the city should have incurred. The repair costs to your pump are <br />not being considered, as the city had no control over the pump's use or maintenance. <br />It also may reasonable to reimburse the course for the lost revenue incurred as a result of <br />the delay in removing the blockage. The lost revenue claimed on the Rum River Hills Golf Club <br />letterhead was not substantiated with sufficient documentation. In an effort to resolve this claim, I <br />calculated the approximate revenue loss for this period using the documentation provided to me. <br />The information you provided indicates the golf course was closed 5 days. <br />Using the Profit & Loss Comparison Report that you provided, I calculated the average <br />daily revenue for Greens Fees and Carts. The comparison provides a 106 day period of the years <br />2010 and 2011. Dividing each revenue stream by the days in the period I determined the average <br />daily revenue for each line item in 2010 and multiplied it by 5. This table provides the maximum <br />loss that could have been incurred in the 5 days the golf course was closed. <br />18-Hole Green fees $ 2,779.75 <br />9-Hole Green fees $ 956.65 <br />Carts $ 1,791.95 <br />Total $ 5,528.35 <br />The profit and loss statement provided by the golf course shows that the revenues for the <br />Driving Range, Memberships, Senior -Junior, and Green Fee Twilight were up from July 17th to <br />October 23rd 2011 compared to the 2010 period. Those items will not be considered in my <br />calculations as there was no loss. Tournament revenue was also not considered as there was no <br />documentation showing that any loss of revenue was directly related to this flooding event. <br />I cannot reimburse the golf course the cost to repair turf that the flood may have directly <br />damaged because I have not received adequate documentation proving that portion of the loss. In <br />addition to this, some of these areas appear to fall in the designed flood plain and were intended <br />for water storage. To prove your claim for damaged turf you must provide adequate documentation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.