Laserfiche WebLink
in analyzing the sales ratio study, the assessor should: 1) Investigate whelher lower priced <br />properties and higher priced properties are treated equally; 2) Whether the assessment bias <br />is against newer homes or whether the assessment presently on the tax roll discriminates by <br />location or whether present assessmenl indicates significanl differences in the assessmenl <br />quality in respect to property type. One of lhe essential elements in any sales ratio study is <br />breaking down the data used into specific zones or neighborhoods. All the properties in a <br />specific neighborhood or zone should be similar types of property. In other words, one story <br />ramblers should be compared to one stow ramblers of similar age, size and style as well as two <br />-h)ry's should be compared to other two story's. Aisc the neighborhoods should be very <br />homogenous or have similar types and values of properlies. If these zones or neighborhoods <br />include vastly different types of improvements or properties, then the ratio study is distorted <br />and will not leave a meaningful conclusion of the overall assessment to that zone or <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />In the City of Ramsey, it was noted that all the properties which had City sewer and water were <br />contained in the same neighborhood or zone. In other words, cluster homes in Flintwood Hills of <br />approximately $55,000.00 to $60,000.00 property value were in the same zone or <br />neighborhood as properties which were on the Rum River of estimated markel values anywhere <br />between $100,000.00 to $300,000.00. That fact meant that an "across the board" adjustment <br />in value would be equally applicable to the cluster homes and the river properties. As those two <br />markets are so dissimilar, it would make it impossible for an assessor to make a correction in <br />that zone or neighborhood. The ramifications of that fact were that cluster homes in Flintwood <br />Hills were being assessed at a much higher rate that the actual market value and river <br />properties were under assessed below their actual market value. When the assessor discovered <br />this problem, he began to look elsewhere for other dissimilar properties which were included <br />in the same zone or neighborhood. What the assessor found is that there were serious <br />discrepancies throughout all of the zones in the City of Ramsey and a new format for the <br />neighborhoods or zones had to be instituted. The previous assessment zones were by geographic <br />locations or sections which brought serious dissimilarities among the zones or neighborhoods. <br /> <br />The first step in the reassessment of the City of Ramsey involved breaking down the City into <br />homogenous neighborhoods or neighborhoods of similar type and value properties. The primary <br />basis for these neighborhoods was the land value in each of these areas or neighborhoods. The <br />assessor researched all of the lot sales in 1988 and 1989 to arrive at a conclusion of land value <br />for all of the various areas in the City of Ramsey. By using vacant land sales to get a value per <br />site of the individual lots and by using an extraction method on improved property sales, the <br />assessor found that there were nine specific land value zones or neighborhoods. By using land <br />value as a criteria for establishing these zones, the reassessment process was a market <br />quided..approach. After identifying these nine zones, the assessor proceeded to map them out on <br />a City map and go out and investigate each of these areas to determine if the properties or <br />improvements in these neighborhoods were similar in nature and exhibited the same values and <br />.~--.,.,.,,::i.:~l characteristics throughout the zone. That analysis led to the formulation of a plan by <br />which the City could be broken down into homogenous neighborhoods and therefore allow the <br />assessor to make more accurate adjustments based on the sales ratio studies to improve the <br />accuracy of the assessment with respect to market value and to insure equity in the assessment <br />or that all types of properties will be treated equally with respect to market value. <br /> <br /> <br />