Laserfiche WebLink
The various zones or neighborhoods that were used are described as follows: Zone 1 which <br />consisted of the river properties on both the Rum and Mississipp; Rivers; Zone 2 would be lots <br />(some with sewer and water) which were immediately off the Rum River and exhibited higher <br />values th&r, other non-river properties. Zone 3 which comprised a large portion of the City of <br />Ramsey which was described as lhose properties comprised of lots of less than five acres and <br />exhibiting land values for similar one acre lots of approximately $14,000.00 to $18,000.00; <br />Zone 5 would be described as those properties between five and fen acres; Zone 6 would be those <br />properlies with lots greater than 10 acres; Zone 7 would be comprised of properlies of lots <br />h~irL0 less than five acres in size and exhibiting a value in the $9,000.00 to $14,000.00 price <br />range; Zone 8 would be described as those properties wilh lots less than five acres in size and <br />with the value of approximately $18,000.00 to $25,000.00; Zone 9 would be described as <br />those properties in the cluster homes of Flintwood Hills which exhibited a value of <br />approximately $4,000.00 to $5,000.00 per lot; and finally Zone 0 would be all commercially <br />zones property in the City of Ramsey. Upon the completion of setting all the various properties <br />into their respective zones, the sales ratio study was then conducted in January of 1990. The <br />new study had a median ratio of 94.3% with the coefficient of dispersion to lhe median of 7.7 <br />(this was lhe overall ratio for the entire City of Ramsey). Upon closer inspection, breaking <br />down the various neighborhoods, it was found that some of the neighborhoods were at a higher <br />ratio level than 95% and some were below. This indicated that still some inequities existed in <br />the 1990 assessment. Therefore, a restructuring of the land values among the various zones <br />was completed and a new sales ratio was printed in February, 1990. This ratio indicated a <br />median of 94.8% and a coefficient of dispersion to the median of 6.9. It was then concluded that <br />the 1990 assessment was ready to be submitted to the County and that it met the standards for <br />County and State assessment standards and that the assessment for the City of Ramsey for 1990 <br />represented a fair and equitable assessment of properties throughout the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />APPLYING THE SOLUTION: HOW THE 1990 ASSESSMENT WAS PREPARED <br /> <br />After the neighborhoods were identified and each zone was designated, the next step was to place <br />the land value in each of these zones. This was done using two appraisal methods for the <br />valuation of land. The first method is simply the actual market value or sale price of lots that <br />have sold in each zone. The second method is called the allocation method whereby an improved <br />property is sold and the value of the improvements are deducted from the total sale price to <br />render an estimated lot value. The former method is the preferred method. The latter method is <br />used only in the absence of vacant lot sales and also as a check on the first method to see if <br />discrepancies exist in the actual lot sales. This report contains a list of all the land sales in the <br />City of Ramsey in 1989. I will discuss the evaluation of land in each zone later in this report. <br /> <br />After the land valuations are complete, it is necessary to value the improvements of each <br />!r~divir?ual property. This was accomplished by the aid of the Anoka County CAMA which stands <br />for Cornputer Assisted Mass Appraisal System and a matched pairs market analysis for various <br />amenities conducted in May, 1989. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />