Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Backous stated he has nothing against the franchise fee concept but would not <br />support $14 /month. He indicated it was his impression that the intention was $7 /month and <br />asked if a lower franchise fee could be considered. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would not support a franchise fee but was not opposed to having a <br />portion of the road project assessed, especially road reconstruction. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that has been the challenge with this issue, some feel <br />assessments should be phased out and others support assessments. He noted there are benefits to <br />a franchise fee beyond collecting from non - taxable because it also creates equity between <br />residential units. However, an inequity is with residents not connected to natural gas since they <br />would pay only one -half the franchise fee. Ultimately, it is the City Council's decision in how to <br />come up with $3 million and whether with or without assessments. Public Works Director Olson <br />stated the franchise fee was presented at $14 /month and noted it could be phased out over five <br />years with a 25% assessment for reconstruction. <br />Councilmember Backous asked if reconstruction projects can be scaled back and/or put off <br />another year or two. Public Works Director Olson stated he understands it is a difficult situation <br />and decision to make, and projects could be scaled back but the Council still needs to solve the <br />issue of additional funding sources. He pointed out that a 40 -year design life capitalizes on the <br />Anoka sand plain and maintenance of the roadway system in sealcoats and overlays will extend <br />the pavement life. Public Works Olson noted staff had presented a conservative approach and <br />spread cost over a 40 -year time frame. However, 50% of the City's roads were built between <br />1975 and 1985 so delaying projects further will result in the reconstruction effort falling behind. <br />Councilmember Elvig arrived at 5:24 p.m. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would support a 40% tax capacity rate but when you add in the <br />franchise fee, it is back up to about 52 %. <br />Councilmember Elvig noted the first goal was to pull down taxes to get a leaner environment by <br />cutting back costs. Staff's recommended cuts reduce the budget by $1.4 million and the <br />franchise fee would offset that reduction by raising $1.5 million, resulting in a zero net increase <br />to taxes. Councilmember Elvig noted the franchise fee would allow the creation of a $1.5 <br />million dedicated road fund supported by all utility users including non - profits. <br />Finance Officer Lund corrected that adding the franchise fee would increase the tax capacity to <br />44 %, not 52 %. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he wants the tax capacity to be at 40 %, noting the tax capacity was 44% <br />last year and 39% the previous year. <br />Councilmember Backous stated if the franchise fee is cut to $7 /month, it brings the net tax <br />capacity to 41 %. He indicated he would support a franchise fee under $10 /month <br />Finance Officer Lund advised that a $7 /month franchise fee would generate $825,000. <br />City Council Work Session / April 10, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />