Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Tossey noted the City cannot bond for a project unless it is 20% assessed. He <br />expressed concern that funding road projects only from franchise fees would limit the City <br />because it would not have the ability to bond should there be a critical road project. <br />Councilmember McGlone stated what the counter petition process costs the City. <br />Public Works Director Olson estimated $150,000 for Andrie Street. <br />Councilmember McGlone noted residents that are selling their house would not want their <br />property assessed. <br />Mayor Ramsey advised that staff has made some progress on the counter petition process. <br />City Administrator Ulrich reported staff had conversation with the Charter Commission and <br />Commissioners indicated they were open to setting a higher percentage requirement, from 35% <br />to 50% or greater, for residents to be able to overturn a project. <br />Councilmember Backous stated the assessment for Andrie Street was to be $1,500. <br />Public Works Director Olson explained that Andrie Street was originally proposed as an overlay <br />but members of the association that came forward said they wanted a reconstruct. Since it is an <br />MSA road, it had to be built larger so that was done and an overlay assessment considered. The <br />City went forward with project design with anticipation that assessment rates would be about <br />$1,800 to $2,000 with the rest funded with MSA. He estimated that assessment may have <br />equaled 20% of the total project cost. <br />Councilmember McGlone noted the residents would not support paying it. <br />Public Works Director Olson agreed the vast majority of residents were opposed at that time, not <br />because of the assessment, but because of the sidewalk. <br />Councilmember Wise stated he believes strongly in the franchise fee because of the equity it <br />brings; a person living in an apartment generates the same wear and tear on the roads as someone <br />on a 20 -acre parcel. He stated he understands the suggestion to reduce the franchise fee but <br />noted it would be a "band aid" and not fix the problem of funding road projects. Councilmember <br />Wise stated Councilmember Tossey makes a good point about not being able to bond for a <br />project, which may involve a considerable project to overcome. <br />Public Works Director Olson noted that in January the Council had discussed a 50% assessment <br />and scaled it back to 25% with a franchise fee. He indicated if there are no assessments or <br />franchise fees, internal borrowing or a reserve would need to be built so the City can afford <br />larger projects. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated the City had not put away funds for streets for years and he would not <br />support asking for a "raise" from residents to meet that need. <br />City Council Work Session / April 10, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 13 <br />