My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/15/1986 - Public Hearing
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1986
>
Minutes - Council - 04/15/1986 - Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 8:38:45 AM
Creation date
11/5/2003 1:54:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Public Hearing
Document Date
04/15/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
concerned with the health factor in regards to the effect of the water on the <br />proper operation of the septic tank and drainfields. What can I do until there <br />is storm sewer? <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - Storm sewers districts are a long term approach to the problem. <br />City Staff is discussing these problems and deciding what to do immediately to <br />address them. We hope to have a recommendation to Council on April 22. <br /> <br />Lynn Ackerman - The audience keeps asking how we can expect to decide on a <br />financing method when we don't know the costs; Mr. Hartley keeps repeating that <br />a financing method is needed so the city knows what it can do. When you are in <br />the market for a house, you look at the location, how much it will cost and <br />it's advantages and disadvantagas. I have no idea what this pipe will cost. <br />Has anyone stopped to make a feasibility study of any kind? I have lived here <br />since 10 years and 1976 was a very dry year. Has anyone counted how many homes <br />and acres will be affected and the general price of a system so we can have <br />that information on which to base a financing method decision. Adopting the <br />ordinance establishing the districts, then proposing the project and making the <br />costs known, a petitioning process to stop the improvement, and going to a <br />referendum could delay a solution to people's water problems for another 1-1/2 <br />years. Can't we have some cost figures now? <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - We have some cost estimates for a complete storm sewer system but <br />it may only take Phase I of that system construction to solve the problems. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka - The estimated cost for a total storm sewer system in the West <br />Drainage District is 3 million; in the South Central District it is estimated <br />at 2.4 million. For now, we are considering the first phase which is estimated <br />at $400,000-$500,000. <br /> <br />Lynn Ackerman - Where do the people footing the bill go when we find out it <br />will cost twice as much as expected and the method of financing chosen will <br />cost us more. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - The cost of the project is going to be the same no matter which <br />way you finance it. If we were able to establish special assessments that were <br />absolutely fair and establish taxing districts that were absolutely fair, <br />everbody would have the same cost. We can't do that. We want to tell Council <br />that the public prefers one approach versus another. I don't think the <br />information we could provide you would be close enough to accurate for you to <br />base such a decision on. <br /> <br />Lynn Ackerman - Then this evening is a bust and what are we debating? <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - You are saying you prefer the special assessment approach because <br />you can't go with taxing districts on a case by case basis. <br /> <br />Lynn Ackerman - Is there a way to subdivide these taxing districts? <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka - Each district would have their own tax levy because each <br />districts storm sewer needs may be different. <br /> <br />Lynn Ackerman - If we wind up with a large discrepancy between the two <br /> April 15, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 10 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.