Laserfiche WebLink
cannot require the developer to further develop the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich - It is general knowledge that the water table is as high now as <br />it has been in 10-15 years. Some of these problems were not recognized when <br />certain areas were developed. Had the city required more of the developers <br />with regards to drainage, curbs, etc., the buyers of the properties would still <br />have paid for those extras. <br /> <br />Lyle Eggers - 7930 157th - Have seen the drainage problems but why does the <br />water stop at Hwy. 10; there should be a natural drainage flow to the river. <br />County Rd. ~83 is being ruined because developers are draining northward. Hwy. <br />#10 stops the natural flow of the drainage and now the citizens have to pay to <br />correct the problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka - Hwy. 10 stops the drainage and forms a physical barrier. In the <br />Fall of 1985, monitoring wells were installed and it was found that once you go <br />across Hwy. 10 the water table drops 7'-8'. <br /> <br />Lyle Eggers - I think the Federal government should pay for ruining a natural <br />drainage pattern. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka - The heavy rainfalls over the past few years are also <br />contributing to the drainage problems. <br /> <br />Lyle Eggers - The heavy rainfalls are just a natural cycle we are going <br />through. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - The Department of Transportation will pay for some of the <br />drainage system based on the amount of square footage they occupy. If the city <br />ever does any improvements in that area, we will be sure to contact them. <br /> <br />Terry O'Connor - 15311 Iguana Street NW - I am planning on selling and leaving <br />the area by this summer. If what you are proposing goes the way you want it to <br />go, will I have to pay off my share of the improvements at the sale closing? <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - Don't think that we are trying to sell you a method of financing <br />storm sewer drainage systems. We are giving you one of the options. More than <br />likely you would not be paying for the improvement before you leave. If <br />Council would adopt the ordinance on April 22, it would not become effective <br />until 30 days after it's official publication. After that, a public hearing on <br />the improvements is required. It is not likely that any property taxes would <br />be levied related to those improvements until 1987 at the earliest, and even <br />more likely to be 1988. If we used the method of special assessments, whether <br />or not the seller or buyer pays the assessment is a negotiable item. <br /> <br />Terry O'Connor - Whenever the city conducts a public hearing, the potentially <br />affected persons are notified by letter. I just happened to notice this public <br />hearing notification in the paper; a lot of the residents do not get the Anoka <br />Union. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley - Law requires us to publish public hearing notices in the city's <br />legal newspaper. The Union did us a favor and published it as front page; it <br />is hour hope that people would read that paper. We also included an article <br /> April 15, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />