My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 09/11/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 09/11/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:23:13 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 4:41:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
09/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Important Service - Specific Considerations <br />Some of the factors that influence the comparability of code enforcement data are: <br />• Proactive enforcement — Whether a jurisdiction engages in proactive enforcement or complaint - <br />driven enforcement can affect the number of violations reported. <br />• Code enforcement staff —The availability of dedicated code enforcement staff can influence a <br />jurisdiction's ability to address code violations quickly, which in turn can influence inspection time <br />frames and case closure rates. <br />• Local importance —The salience of code enforcement issues to members of the local community can <br />affect not only the number of violations reported but also compliance rates and time frames. <br />Broadly speaking, the physical, political, and demographic characteristics of each reporting jurisdiction <br />also influence performance: <br />• Examples include unusually good or bad weather, new state or federal mandates, significant <br />changes in state or federal aid, major budget cuts, and median household income. Citizen <br />preferences, council or board priorities, local tax resources, and state - imposed spending limits cause <br />additional variation in the funds, equipment, and staff available for providing code enforcement <br />services. <br />A list of additional considerations applying to all service areas is included in the introduction to this <br />report. Please review it before reporting, analyzing, or otherwise using the information in this report. <br />Suggested Applications <br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY2011 Code Enforcement /3 <br />• Examine your performance compared to peers and mean and medians. If you are performing <br />above the norms, check in with ICMA if you'd be willing to share what you're doing to achieve high <br />performance. Your practices may be suitable for write -up that can be shared with others. If you find <br />that you'd like to improve performance in any areas, check the analysis and effective practice case <br />studies posted on the CPM 101 group on the ICMA Knowledge Network. The studies are full of <br />examples of how local governments have used performance measurement to find improvement <br />targets and boost performance —and to promote ongoing high performance. You can also check out <br />the What Works Case Studies posted on the performance measurement topic page. <br />• Prepare a report for your supervisor, manager, elected officials, or others. Using the data you <br />have evaluated and the goals you are hoping to achieve, write a report to be shared with the <br />manager, elected officials, the public or others. It is important that results and goals are <br />communicated clearly to those in the jurisdiction. <br />Check out CPM's public website (icma.org /performance) and click on the Certificate Program link <br />under the Services & Publications tab to view samples of reports prepared by participants in the <br />CPM Comprehensive program. <br />OCMA Center for Performance Measurement'" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.