My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 09/11/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 09/11/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:23:13 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 4:41:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
09/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Explanatory Notes <br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY 2011 Police Services / 129 <br />Figure 11 -2 <br />• Some variation in expenditure levels may be due to difference in daytime population levels. <br />Jurisdictions that experience a large influx of commuters, tourists, or other visitors who use police <br />services but who are not counted in the resident population may appear to have disproportionately <br />high expenditure levels on a per capita basis. <br />Figure 11 - 3 <br />• Note that this indicator is calculated on the basis of UCR Part I crimes only. It does not include UCR <br />Part 11 drug violations or other offenses. <br />• The percentage of UCR Part I crimes cleared is calculated by dividing the number of UCR Part I <br />crimes cleared by the number of UCR Part I crimes reported. Among jurisdictions, there is variation <br />in how reported violent crimes are counted. Some jurisdictions do not count unfounded cases as <br />crimes reported; others count unfounded cases because they constitute reports of crimes. The <br />incidence of unfounded reports is unknown. If reports of unfounded crimes are included in the <br />count of crimes reported, the percentage cleared will appear artificially low because it is based on a <br />number higher than the number of actual crimes. <br />• No jurisdictions reported a value of zero. All jurisdictions for which a value is not shown did not <br />report the data or indicated that the data were not available. <br />Figure 11 - 5 <br />• Some variation in the values reported for this indicator may be attributed to differences in state and <br />local blood alcohol thresholds and other standards that may need to be met in order to arrest <br />suspects for driving under the influence (DUI) offenses. <br />Figure 11 - 6 <br />• The way in which calls are received and dispatched can affect response times. For example, in some <br />jurisdictions, top priority police calls are initially received through a local 911 center and then <br />transferred to the police department for dispatch, if necessary. In other jurisdictions, the calls may <br />be both received and dispatched through the 911 center or some other single point of service. In <br />jurisdictions where a transfer is necessary, response times will likely be longer. <br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement'" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.