|
Section 12: Procurement
<br />Procurement Respondents at a Glance
<br />Included in the table below are all jurisdictions that submitted data for at least one procurement
<br />question, as well as some basic information about each jurisdiction's procurement structure. Additional
<br />procurement figures appear later in this section.
<br />Jurisdiction
<br />Figure 12 -1. Descriptors: Procurement Characteristics (page 1 of 2)
<br />Population
<br />Organizational structure
<br />Louisville Metro Govt KY
<br />Chula Vista CA
<br />Fort Lauderdale FL
<br />Sugar Land TX
<br />O'Fallon MO
<br />Lancaster County SC
<br />Eau Claire WI
<br />Rancho Cordova CA
<br />Oshkosh WI
<br />Greenwich CT
<br />Delray Beach FL
<br />New Braunfels TX
<br />Manhattan KS
<br />Noblesville IN
<br />Wauwatosa WI
<br />Campbell County WY
<br />Rohnert Park CA
<br />Annapolis MD
<br />Columbia TN
<br />Dartmouth MA
<br />Andover MA
<br />Salisbury MD
<br />Accomack County VA
<br />Algonquin IL
<br />Dover NH
<br />Windsor CT
<br />Newburgh NY
<br />Monterey CA
<br />Greer SC
<br />Sahuarita AZ
<br />Dedham MA
<br />Fredericksburg VA
<br />Ramsey MN
<br />Junction City KS
<br />Peters Township PA
<br />Libertyville IL
<br />741,096
<br />246,496
<br />165,521
<br />84,511
<br />80,860
<br />76,652
<br />66,060
<br />65,502
<br />64,592
<br />61,171
<br />60,831
<br />57,040
<br />52,135
<br />51,969
<br />46,396
<br />46,133
<br />41,194
<br />38,394
<br />34,681
<br />34,412
<br />33,201
<br />30,343
<br />30,223
<br />30,046
<br />29,987
<br />29,060
<br />28,866
<br />27,810
<br />25,515
<br />25,2519
<br />24,729
<br />24,286
<br />23,668
<br />23,353
<br />21,378
<br />20,742
<br />Centralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Centralized contracting/decentralized buying
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized contracting /decentralized buying
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized contracting/decentralized buying
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY 2011 Procurement /130
<br />Dollar value of all
<br />purchases
<br />(including
<br />construction)*
<br />$39,029,332
<br />$69,181,441
<br />Dollar value of
<br />construction
<br />purchases only*
<br />$875,000
<br />Number of
<br />Procurement
<br />FTEs*
<br />3.0
<br />11.0
<br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement ""
<br />$2,668,310
<br />$1,600,986
<br />$27,495,609
<br />$4,486,812
<br />1.0
<br />$33,327,408
<br />2.0
<br />$52,594,840
<br />2.8
<br />5.4
<br />$16,837,448
<br />$8,700,000
<br />2.0
<br />$10,610,347
<br />$176,538
<br />$369,476
<br />$12,754,575
<br />$5,437,256
<br />$0
<br />1.0
<br />$2,663,978
<br />2.6
<br />$0
<br />0.8
<br />$11,915,086 $4,512,505
<br />1.8
<br />$10,661,372
<br />$2,240,875
<br />3.7
<br />$25,240,999
<br />$6,467,104
<br />1.5
<br />$65,258
<br />$0
<br />Section 12: Procurement
<br />Procurement Respondents at a Glance
<br />Included in the table below are all jurisdictions that submitted data for at least one procurement
<br />question, as well as some basic information about each jurisdiction's procurement structure. Additional
<br />procurement figures appear later in this section.
<br />Jurisdiction
<br />Figure 12 -1. Descriptors: Procurement Characteristics (page 1 of 2)
<br />Population
<br />Organizational structure
<br />Louisville Metro Govt KY
<br />Chula Vista CA
<br />Fort Lauderdale FL
<br />Sugar Land TX
<br />O'Fallon MO
<br />Lancaster County SC
<br />Eau Claire WI
<br />Rancho Cordova CA
<br />Oshkosh WI
<br />Greenwich CT
<br />Delray Beach FL
<br />New Braunfels TX
<br />Manhattan KS
<br />Noblesville IN
<br />Wauwatosa WI
<br />Campbell County WY
<br />Rohnert Park CA
<br />Annapolis MD
<br />Columbia TN
<br />Dartmouth MA
<br />Andover MA
<br />Salisbury MD
<br />Accomack County VA
<br />Algonquin IL
<br />Dover NH
<br />Windsor CT
<br />Newburgh NY
<br />Monterey CA
<br />Greer SC
<br />Sahuarita AZ
<br />Dedham MA
<br />Fredericksburg VA
<br />Ramsey MN
<br />Junction City KS
<br />Peters Township PA
<br />Libertyville IL
<br />741,096
<br />246,496
<br />165,521
<br />84,511
<br />80,860
<br />76,652
<br />66,060
<br />65,502
<br />64,592
<br />61,171
<br />60,831
<br />57,040
<br />52,135
<br />51,969
<br />46,396
<br />46,133
<br />41,194
<br />38,394
<br />34,681
<br />34,412
<br />33,201
<br />30,343
<br />30,223
<br />30,046
<br />29,987
<br />29,060
<br />28,866
<br />27,810
<br />25,515
<br />25,2519
<br />24,729
<br />24,286
<br />23,668
<br />23,353
<br />21,378
<br />20,742
<br />Centralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Centralized contracting/decentralized buying
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized contracting /decentralized buying
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized contracting/decentralized buying
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized
<br />Decentralized
<br />Centralized with delegated authority
<br />Decentralized with central review
<br />CPM 101 Annual Report: FY 2011 Procurement /130
<br />Dollar value of all
<br />purchases
<br />(including
<br />construction)*
<br />$39,029,332
<br />$69,181,441
<br />Dollar value of
<br />construction
<br />purchases only*
<br />$875,000
<br />Number of
<br />Procurement
<br />FTEs*
<br />3.0
<br />11.0
<br />OICMA Center for Performance Measurement ""
<br />
|