My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/29/1986
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1986
>
Minutes - Council - 04/29/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 8:42:11 AM
Creation date
11/5/2003 2:11:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/29/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Heitman inquired who is responsible for the debt if enough development <br />does not occur to create sufficient increment to make the project self- <br />supporting. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that the debt is the full faith and credit of the City, but <br />there are extremely conservative tax increment projections for this area that <br />exceed $5,000,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley suggested that considering the current financing market and the tax <br />increment tool~ it might be in the City's best interest to borrow sufficient <br />funds to cover the cost of constructing an elevated water tank. <br /> <br />Tom Rennet - Industry Avenue - Inquired as to the total cost per acre for <br />sewer, water and storm sewer. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley replied that there are figures for sewer and water; storm sewer <br />costs are not included because there is still a question on how to finance <br />storm sewer. The figures include interest for those early years before tax <br />increments begin coming in. Mr. Hartley quoted per acre sewer and water costs <br />found in Options 1-5 of Attachment II. Council has to make a decision on which <br />financing option to use that will allow for the best use of tax increment <br />revenues without establishing an unfavorable business relationship between <br />business properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Renner - Stated that before the water system is of any value, the City will <br />have to have an overhead tank and one more municipal well. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley agreed and stated that is why he is suggesting consideration of <br />borrowing enough money to cover the cost of an elevated tank would be <br />worthwhile. <br /> <br />Mr. Rennet - Expressed concern with the proposed location for the new well, <br />the water system because of the type of formations in Ramsey, amount of draw <br />down that will be created and amount of landfill leachate that will be pulled <br />down into the ground. Right now, lower formations are pushing upward; leachate <br />is absorbing downward into the ground, hitting the first clay area and being <br />carried off to rivers by the upward push from water below. Municipal wells <br />will reverse this action and leachate will get into the formations and then <br />into wells. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox to adjourn the public hearing. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mr. Hartley stated that it is not intended that Ramsey <br />Terrace and Flintwood I be assessed for the water main and will not be until <br />they develop in a way that requires tying into the system. Mr. Renner stated <br />that there are residential properties that,will benefit from trunk line <br />construction; will those properties be assessed? Councilmember Cox stated that <br />a portion of the costs will be picked up by tax increment revenues; residential <br />properties are assessed when they hook up to the laterals. Mr. Rennet inquired <br />if any of these improvements are being considered in order to enhance the life <br /> April 29, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.