Laserfiche WebLink
prohibited <br />permitted <br />® Without carefully written standards, developers may use flag lots to avoid building new roads. <br />approval of the pattern book addresses the <br />value of the modulation in achieving a supe- <br />rior design. While a single front yard setback <br />makes sense in a large urban area, in a small <br />hamlet or a traditional mixed use neighbor- <br />hood decreasing setbacks as lots approach <br />the center is one design technique to empha- <br />size the pedestrian -oriented nature of the <br />center. The modulation article should provide <br />for approval of the pattern book -controlled <br />modulation where it creates a desirable <br />design, and the approval criteria should be <br />limited to design considerations. When the <br />regulations prohibit modulation to modify <br />density, land use, and height, many com- <br />mon concerns of citizens at conditional use <br />hearings are taken off the table. Also, limiting <br />modulation to interior lots ameliorates the <br />concerns of citizens worried about impacts <br />on the character of adjoining development. <br />General Flexibility Permitting All <br />Development Forms <br />Euclidian zoning is very inflexible. Other ap- <br />proaches like clustering, planned develop- <br />ments, traditional neighborhood development, <br />and mixed uses have all been found to be <br />more desirable forms of development. In some <br />states this finding is included in the statutes. <br />Despite this, alternative development patterns <br />are often forced to seek conditional approvals. <br />In the 196os, when clustering and planned <br />The modulation article <br />should provide for <br />approval of the pattern <br />book -controlled <br />modulation where it <br />creates a desirable <br />design, and the <br />approval criteria should <br />be limited to design <br />considerations. <br />bad <br />developments were new and planners had no <br />experience with them, the conditional approval <br />made sense. But now it makes no sense for <br />a better design form to have to go through a <br />lengthy, costly, and uncertain process. <br />Communities can provide general <br />flexibility by adopting ordinances that are <br />designed to allow a developer multiple ways <br />of meeting the standards of a district. For resi- <br />dential areas, all dwelling unit types should <br />be permitted in the district subject to meeting <br />density, open space, or design standards to <br />protect the character of the district and to <br />encourage traditional neighborhood, planned, <br />and cluster developments. Permitting all <br />dwelling units eliminates the exclusionary <br />nature of many zoning districts. Development <br />forms such as clustering, planned and tradi- <br />tional neighborhood, and mixed use should <br />be permitted as a matter of right. The zoning <br />standards would still regulate district inten- <br />sity through density, open space, use mix, <br />scale, average and maximum height, and <br />form requirements. These basic controls are <br />essential to ensure the design intent or char- <br />acter is met. Street width can be varied with <br />general rules that address traffic volumes on <br />the street, unit frontage, and parking needs. <br />Quality should be addressed by sign and <br />other controls that address quality of design <br />by setting high standards that should not be <br />modulated. Landscape can be addressed <br />good <br />® With targeted Flexibility, communities can permit flag lots only in special cases, such as when a flag lot <br />would eliminate lot access from a collector road. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 6.12 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION (page 6 <br />