Laserfiche WebLink
Development Services Manager Gladhill stated from a platting perspective you want to maintain <br />a public access that is not impacted by a private easement. He stated this is just a suggestion and <br />reviewed the points of proposed access. <br />Commissioner Ramsey asked how you would resolve existing parcels that do not have direct <br />access to the road. <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill explained this building has the same access as <br />Colburn's and staff is open to having conversation with the City Attorney regarding access <br />options. <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated he wants the HRA to be aware, since Mr. Wise is a <br />Councilmember /Commissioner, that he would be obtaining fee title to 69,696 sq. ft., just over 1.5 <br />acres, on a square foot basis price that will appear to be quite low ($6 -7 /sq. ft.). He noted it may <br />raise questions from the public as to why others paid $11 /sq. ft. It was noted that the six- tenths <br />of an acre is encumbered but Mr. Wise would obtain fee title. <br />Development Manager Lazan indicated that is correct but there is no use for the one -half acre <br />site except to relieve parking on the south side and this is the best plan from the development <br />side. He advised that Mr. Wise only needs one acre of land so an outlot can be created but then <br />the HRA would be responsible for maintenance of the outlot. <br />Chairperson McGlone noted Mr. Wise will also be paying real estate taxes on that six - tenths of <br />an acre. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated the reality is that gross calculations are common in the real <br />estate industry. <br />Chairperson McGlone asked if any Commissioners have an issue with the Wise transaction. <br />Commissioner Ramsey noted Mr. Wise does not need the property trying to be conveyed for <br />access and has adequate parking with the current site plan of one acre. He asked if Mr. Wise is <br />concerned with having to pay real estate taxes on the extra six - tenths of an acre. <br />Development Manager Lazan indicated Mr. Wise expressed some concern with an extra tax hit <br />and suggested the Development Team work with Anoka County to determine the tax impact <br />since it is based on evaluation and this would be just parking lot subject to an easement. <br />Commissioner Backous asked if the land is purely unusable and undevelopable, such as a low <br />land or wetland. <br />Development Manager Lazan advised that once the easement is recorded, the property would be <br />unbuildable. <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised that under Minnesota Statutes, the meeting can move into closed <br />session to discuss acquisition negotiations. He indicated closed session discussion will relate to <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / July 31, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />